Date: 6/11/1999, 1:50 pm
Pygmy vs CLC means dangerous terrain, so I understand very well if you are reluctant to respond...
However, forget the companies and think design, boats. How are the differences in rough water?
From the Coho vs Tern Thread we learn that the Tern seems to be the best of these two in rough conditions. Bajabu writes:
" I built both the Tern and the Coho. The Tern has fewer parts to assemble so it builds faster. I took both kayaks to Baja last winter for two months and was able to try both kayaks in various sea conditions. My favorite was the Tern because it was great in the surf and following seas. When the wind blows your only choice is to go with it (20 knot plus), or find a landing site which all to often ends up being in the surf. I found the Tern much easier to control in the surf, in fack I found myself play in the surf while others were stuck on the beach. The Coho is faster but if you want an all around fun and responsive boat I would build the Tern. There should be a write up on the Tern in Sea Kayaker soon. E-mail me if you have any questions. "
Bot Chesapeak 17 and North Bay XL are also hard chined designs, how do they compare? Any experiences?
Jan Gunnar
Messages In This Thread
- Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
Jan Gunnar Moe -- 6/11/1999, 1:50 pm- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
Bobby Curtis -- 6/17/1999, 11:10 am- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
Dean Trexel -- 6/11/1999, 11:25 pm- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
Don Lueder -- 6/14/1999, 11:44 pm- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
lee -- 6/16/1999, 11:28 am- Re: Deck Strength--CLC vs. Pygmy
Shawn Baker -- 6/15/1999, 3:18 pm- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
Randy Knauff -- 6/15/1999, 1:06 pm - Re: Deck Strength--CLC vs. Pygmy
- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL
- Re: Arctic Tern vs CLC Chesapeak vs North Bay XL