> I've built a Chesapeake 17 and a Pygmy Osprey Standard. Both are great
> boats. They seemed about equally difficult to build. The slight additional
> time required for the multichine hull and multipanel deck on the Osprey
> Standard were offset by the hassle of bending the deck panel on the
> Chesapeake during installation. I think the Osprey Standard is a little
> stronger because it has complete fiberglass coverage inside and out. The
> Chesapeake cockpit is roomier, making it more comfortable for me
> (5'11", 185 pounds), but my wife (5'8", 125 pounds) prefers the
> Pygmy. I like the recessed hatches on the Pygmy a lot more than the
> hatches on the Chesapeake. They are far more water tight.

> Both boats handle great on the water. The Chesapeake feels a little more
> stable because of the hard chine design. I prefer the Chesapeake for
> fishing because of this. We mostly paddle on sheltered saltwater areas in
> Maine. Dave, I am grateful to hear from someone who has made boats both from CLC and Pygmy. Obviously, both companies make good boats and the issues of multipanel vs bending the deck are issues that can be dealt with in either case. I am especially glad to hear about the difference in cockpit fit because my husband prefers a very tight fit while I prefer a little extra room. Glad both your boats are what you hoped for. Thanks for the help. Toni
> Both companies offer great support over the phone. You can't go wrong with
> either.