Date: 7/21/1999, 6:45 pm
Here's the biased opinion of a Pygmy Arctic Tern builder:
Plusses for Pygmy: beveled shear panels leads to fewer whacked fingers when paddling -- beveled deck holds its shape when mated to the deck, it goes together without forcing -- nicer flush hatches (though a bit more time consuming to build) -- raised bow and stern handle big waves better, reduce wash-over, look more like traditional Greenland kayak
Plusses for Chesapeake: smooth cambered deck -- scarf joints (the fiberglass-taped butt joints on my Pygmy came out cloudy, but could be avoided if you get a bubble roller as shown in Nick's book or just be very meticulous with your squeegee) -- one-piece cockpit coaming -- nicer deck rigging attachment than Pygmy's plastic pad-eyes
When I was just starting to look into building a kayak last fall, my gut feeling was that I liked the Chesapeake better. But then I made a checklist of features I liked, and found the Pygmy better suited me. Either way, though, you'll love your boat.
Hope this helps! Dean
Messages In This Thread
- kit confusion
Toni Lipton -- 7/20/1999, 8:16 pm- Re: kit confusion
Jeff Warrick -- 7/22/1999, 8:24 pm- Re: kit confusion
Mike Hanks -- 7/21/1999, 7:07 pm- Re: kit confusion
Dean Trexel -- 7/21/1999, 6:45 pm- Re: kit confusion
John Herr -- 7/21/1999, 5:35 pm- Re: kit confusion
Will Brockman -- 7/21/1999, 11:11 am- Re: kit confusion
dave -- 7/21/1999, 8:18 am- Re: kit confusion
Toni Lipton -- 7/21/1999, 10:22 am
- Re: kit confusion
Hans Friedel -- 7/21/1999, 2:55 am- re: curved deck
Mark Bodnar -- 7/21/1999, 8:07 pm- Re: kit confusion
Toni Lipton -- 7/21/1999, 10:18 am- Re: kit confusion
Toni Lipton -- 7/21/1999, 10:13 am - Re: kit confusion
- Re: kit confusion
paul connolly -- 7/20/1999, 9:41 pm- Re: kit confusion
paul connolly -- 7/20/1999, 9:37 pm - Re: kit confusion
- Re: kit confusion