Re: Putz Walrus Photo
By:Bram
Date: 9/2/1999, 10:58 am
Date: 9/2/1999, 10:58 am
In Response To: Re: Putz Walrus Photo (Mike Hanks)
> 33 pounds., but I still need to add deck rigging and some foam in the
> cockpit, but I will be removing some wood and brass screws in the cockpit.
> It may lose some weight.
> If I was ounce counting, I could have made it in under the 30 pound mark.
> Mike
Say Mike, how did you get the offset dimensions for the walrus. I have a copy of Putz's book but the numbers are so small as to be illegible. I've built his standard 17' model scaled to 18' and I've made a second kayak based on scaling the Skene diagram on page 2. The Skene boat is the nicer of the two.
Bram
Messages In This Thread
- Putz Walrus Photo
Joe Greenley -- 8/31/1999, 12:18 pm- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
Mike Hanks -- 9/1/1999, 4:08 pm- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
Shawn Baker -- 9/1/1999, 5:12 pm- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
Mike Hanks -- 9/1/1999, 6:55 pm- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
Bram -- 9/2/1999, 10:58 am- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
Mike Hanks -- 9/2/1999, 2:14 pm- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
Bram -- 9/3/1999, 11:39 am
- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
- Re: Putz Walrus Photo
Dean Trexel -- 8/31/1999, 6:44 pm - Re: Putz Walrus Photo
- Re: Putz Walrus Photo