> Putz's version suffers from a plunging bow and weathercocking.
> Please explain to this novice what these terms mean and how they would
> affect paddling on quiet, small lakes that sometimes can be plagued by
> moderate breezes. Should I raise the bow as Skene or follow Putz's
> version? Thanks, Tom.
Tom,
A bow that plunges doesn't ride up over waves. It means a wetter ride in rough seas, this should not be a problem on small quiet lakes.
Weathercocking is where the kayak turns into the wind, the wind essentially has a stronger effect on the stern than it does on the bow. This is a simplified explanation. It the wind picks up it means more corrective strokes to paddle in a straight line.
In my opinion, Putz's lines should be fine for most of your paddling, but I would think that Skene's definitely would. I enjoy my Putz with a 1" higher bow quite a bit, The standard bow is fine, but I think the higher bow would be better. It is a judgement call. The higher bow means bending the stringers more, but they should flex that much with no problem. Skinning the higher bow wil be a little more difficult too, but it is doable, the inuits did it. If you wait until after Christmas, I should have more information. Here is a web site with a standard bow Putz.
Mike
Messages In This Thread
- graphing points for Putz Walrus forms
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/15/1999, 3:40 am- Re: graphing points for Putz Walrus forms
Ben -- 10/16/1999, 8:03 pm- Re: graphing points for Putz Walrus forms
Tom Kurth -- 10/15/1999, 8:14 pm- Re: Skene vs. Putz
Mike Hanks -- 10/15/1999, 11:20 am- Re: Skene vs. Putz
Tom Kurth -- 10/16/1999, 8:48 pm- Re: Skene vs. Putz
Mike Hanks -- 10/17/1999, 12:50 am
- No problemo Dude
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/15/1999, 4:41 pm - Re: Skene vs. Putz
- Re: graphing points for Putz Walrus forms
- Re: graphing points for Putz Walrus forms