Date: 1/25/2000, 6:56 pm
> hoo boy, it's snowing and i've got kayak fever, just trying to say that
> the problem is solvable. the characterization of "poor quality"
> doesn't help Will, I can't tell from wills post how much "slightly
> different" is. 1/32"?,1/8"?
> In my experience when problem solving descends to name calling then
> problem solving stops.
> So not sure what kind of response you're expecting on the bike analogy.
> Motobecanes had interesting quality control. Still had to put air in the
> tire. I think lifes generally a miracle let alone be able to talk to pure
> strangers over this board or be able to make an epoxy/glass reinforced
> wood boat. Any fog out in the valley?
HERE HE GOES AGAIN ????
Lee
I'm sorry to come off like a butt-head, but, we definitely have different ideas on some things. I sometimes forget that and get a little overzealous. :)
I read in Will's first post of the "Non-Mirror" shapes of the supposed mirror images of the parts in question. I also see many posts on which possible repairs are offered, and that's cool. However, my feelings are that if the parts aren't right, and as advertised, it needs to be corrected at the source. If not done so, then how many more promising boat builders are gonna have to go through the trouble of finding solutions to fix what they have stumbled into. And how many folks have decided they can't do it, only to have been faulty merchandice. I understand that the boat can be fixed, but, it can also be replaced, or at least new parts attained. Am I wrong? Yeh, we all want to get into the water right now, but, at what cost and just how much are we supposed to absorb in bad materials?? Your statement that That wasn't the problem, tells me that you are willing to grind it out and let it be. My solution and maybe Scotty's would have been to contact CLC and tell them that we received bad parts and can't get it to work as advertised. Differnt'Strokes !! I should probably stop posting until I have something constructive to say. Again, I appologise for sounding ..............well, whatever. ???
No Fog, just 5 or 6 days of rain. Fog next week. :)C-Ya
Rehd
Messages In This Thread
- Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignment
Will -- 1/21/2000, 12:43 pm- Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!
Scotty -- 1/24/2000, 2:18 pm- Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!
lee -- 1/24/2000, 7:10 pm- Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!
Rehd -- 1/25/2000, 12:09 pm- Re: here he goes again
lee -- 1/25/2000, 4:03 pm- Re: here he goes again
Rehd -- 1/25/2000, 6:56 pm- Re: me again
lee -- 1/26/2000, 12:25 am- Re: me again..You're right...
Scotty -- 1/26/2000, 9:06 am
- Re: me again..You're right...
- Re: me again
- Re: here he goes again
- Re: here he goes again
- Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!
Shawn Baker -- 1/24/2000, 5:53 pm- Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!
Scotty -- 1/25/2000, 2:36 pm
- Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!
- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
Ken Finger -- 1/24/2000, 1:45 pm- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
Nolan -- 1/24/2000, 11:36 am- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
lee -- 1/21/2000, 10:49 pm- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
Will -- 1/22/2000, 12:58 am- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
lee -- 1/22/2000, 8:48 am
- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
Nate -- 1/21/2000, 5:53 pm- Re: Adventures in Scarfing: Hull panel mis-alignme
Shawn Baker -- 1/21/2000, 12:51 pm - Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!
- Re: Nobody addressed poor quality kit!