Date: 2/15/2000, 11:54 am
> Hi All;
> I had classes over the weekend (8AM - 7PM Sat & Sun, 11 hours/day!),
> so I did not get a lot of time with "Betsy," my new kayak. But I
> then spent most of Monday with her. I have made some observations about
> stapleless strip building that I think are important:
> 1.) As we add strips, we are building panels that are getting larger by
> the strip. The complex shape of these panels is important - all else is
> not.
> 2.) To produce a fair surface that follows the design lines, we reference
> both the last existing strip (current bevel guide of the panel we've built
> thusfar) and the station form.
> 3.) It follows that the panel must be tight and true to the station before
> the rolling bevel is determined. It does not matter much what the state of
> the panel is before or after you make the bevel measurement. For our
> purposes, it is important only that the panel is in proper contact to the
> stations at the time of the measurement, or subsequent fitup. Thusly, the
> hot glue adhesion of strips to form is inconsequential. You clamp,
> measure, bevel, and install the new strip when the panel is supported - -
> who cares what it does (or did) before or afterward? - - The strip is in
> the proper 3D space as intended by the designer, and you will adjust it to
> fit the forms when you need to.
> In a nutshell, we're building panels, and we must strive to make the panel
> proper above all else . . . If the bevels incorporated into the strips
> comprising the panel are correct, the panel will assume the shape dictated
> by (and derived from) the forms.
> Duct tape, a "surform-like" bevel cutter, and an assortment of
> clamps and homemade clamp assists have made my day . . . Isn't it funny
> that with a shop full of power tools, the good old hand tools (and a
> stupid roll or 10 of duct tape) seems to do the job best . . . ;-)
> New pix up at
> http://www.dbeweb.com/kayak under "construction."
> Best Regards, Spidey
Messages In This Thread
- Stapleless so far - Website updates
Spidey -- 2/15/2000, 1:10 am- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Douglas Kuik -- 2/16/2000, 2:55 pm- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Spidey -- 2/17/2000, 1:26 am
- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Dale Frolander -- 2/16/2000, 3:34 am- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Spidey -- 2/17/2000, 1:22 am- Excellent price
Dale Frolander -- 2/17/2000, 3:41 am
- Excellent price
- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/16/2000, 12:11 am- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Spidey -- 2/16/2000, 2:34 am- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Ross Leidy -- 2/16/2000, 9:36 am- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Spidey -- 2/17/2000, 1:12 am
- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Larry C. -- 2/15/2000, 12:57 pm- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
Spidey -- 2/16/2000, 2:16 am
- Red Green would be proud of you (no text)
Bram -- 2/15/2000, 11:54 am- Re: Red Green would be proud of you (no text)
Spidey -- 2/16/2000, 1:57 am- Re: Red Green would be proud of you (no text)
Shawn Baker -- 2/16/2000, 4:00 pm- Re: Red Green for Prime Minister!!
Ian Johnston -- 2/16/2000, 3:37 am- Re: Red Green for Prime Minister!!
Spidey -- 2/17/2000, 1:03 am- Re: Red Green for Prime Minister!!
Ian Johnston -- 2/17/2000, 1:50 am
- Quondo Omni Flunkus Moritati
Shawn Baker -- 2/16/2000, 4:16 pm- Re: Red Green for Prime Minister!!
Don -- 2/16/2000, 3:59 am- Re: Red Green for Prime Minister!!
Ian Johnston -- 2/17/2000, 1:56 am
- Re: Red Green for Prime Minister!!
- Re: Red Green for Prime Minister!!
- Re: Red Green would be proud of you (no text)
- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates
- Re: Stapleless so far - Website updates