Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
By:Spidey
Date: 3/13/2000, 6:07 pm
Date: 3/13/2000, 6:07 pm
In Response To: Guillemot Photos Finally (image) (Shawn Baker)
Hey, cut that out!
If you guys raise the bar any higher, I'll have to pay someone from the Ringling School of Art to design my deck! Whatever happened to "a couple of pinstripes . . . Great work Shawn, it is going to be one fine kayak. I have stopped worrying about how speedy I am, rather I'm just trying to enjoy each cut, bevel, twist, and as Nick says, the smell of fresh cedar with each curl that you remove. Enjoy.
Best Regards, Spidey (Ken)
Messages In This Thread
- Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Shawn Baker -- 3/13/2000, 2:10 pm- Nicely done
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 1:47 pm- Re: Nicely done
Shawn Baker -- 3/14/2000, 1:56 pm- Re: Nicely done
Nolan -- 3/16/2000, 8:10 am- Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 2:59 pm- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Don Beale -- 3/15/2000, 11:50 am- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/15/2000, 11:58 am
- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
- Strip deck / S&G hull
- Re: Nicely done
- Photo Moratorium
Ken Finger -- 3/14/2000, 1:21 pm- Re: Photo Moratorium
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 8:58 am- Re: Waldens
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 11:33 am- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 12:31 pm- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 1:11 pm- Re: Short and wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:34 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 7:37 am- Re: Short and (not) wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 12:01 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 12:52 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 3:42 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 4:04 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 4:18 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 1:31 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 1:58 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 2:51 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:19 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Kelly Trehearne -- 3/17/2000, 4:19 am
- Re: A Wooden Vision - Back on Topic
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:10 pm- Re: A Wooden Vision , indeed!
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 4:20 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 3:16 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:57 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?
lee -- 3/16/2000, 10:14 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
Scotty -- 3/17/2000, 1:42 am
- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
- Re: Teeny Tern?
- Re: Teeny Tern
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and wide
- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
- Re: Waldens
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
pete czerpak -- 3/14/2000, 7:56 am- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
mike allen ---} -- 3/13/2000, 11:34 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Kent LeBoutillier -- 3/13/2000, 6:56 pm- Got that old loving feeling
Jack -- 3/14/2000, 10:56 am
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Spidey -- 3/13/2000, 6:07 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 4:50 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Tony -- 3/13/2000, 5:06 pm- Ivory inlays?
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 5:42 pm- no ivory, please.
Paul G. Jacobson -- 3/14/2000, 9:19 pm- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
Ed Valley -- 3/16/2000, 12:47 pm- Re: no ivory, please.
Tony -- 3/15/2000, 5:46 pm - Re: no ivory, please.
- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
- no ivory, please.
- Ivory inlays?
- Re: Guillemot Photos - looking good
Mike Hanks -- 3/13/2000, 4:40 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Hank -- 3/13/2000, 4:32 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Ross Leidy -- 3/13/2000, 2:30 pm - Re: Nicely done
- Nicely done