> Mike,
> I am looking for short, and not wide. Unfortunately, most 12' - 13' boats
> out there are quite wide, including the plastic ones. The reason I chose
> the Walden Vision (my first boat) over it's competitors a couple years ago
> was that it was the narrowest (25") one in the group by several
> inches. I've been very happy with it, with only two complaints: the deck
> is high making it difficult to roll, and it's made out of plastic.
> The Pygmy Golden Eye 13 has good dimensions, but the displacement can only
> support a child or an adult smaller than me (5'8", 165 lbs). The Mill
> Creek is simply much wider than what I'm looking for. I'm not familiar
> with the Bolger boat or the Tursiops, but I'll check them out.
> Thanks,
> Ken
Ken,
The problem is that to decrease length and maitain displacement you need to increase something else (width or height).
The bolger kayak has a flat (from side to side) one piece bottom that is curved front to back. It also has a flat deck with a box-like cockpit/coaming. I don't think it would be very easy to roll.
How do you intend to use this short kayak? Do you want something with a decent amount of volume?
Mike
Messages In This Thread
- Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Shawn Baker -- 3/13/2000, 2:10 pm- Nicely done
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 1:47 pm- Re: Nicely done
Shawn Baker -- 3/14/2000, 1:56 pm- Re: Nicely done
Nolan -- 3/16/2000, 8:10 am- Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 2:59 pm- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Don Beale -- 3/15/2000, 11:50 am- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/15/2000, 11:58 am
- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
- Strip deck / S&G hull
- Re: Nicely done
- Photo Moratorium
Ken Finger -- 3/14/2000, 1:21 pm- Re: Photo Moratorium
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 8:58 am- Re: Waldens
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 11:33 am- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 12:31 pm- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 1:11 pm- Re: Short and wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:34 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 7:37 am- Re: Short and (not) wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 12:01 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 12:52 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 3:42 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 4:04 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 4:18 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 1:31 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 1:58 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 2:51 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:19 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Kelly Trehearne -- 3/17/2000, 4:19 am
- Re: A Wooden Vision - Back on Topic
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:10 pm- Re: A Wooden Vision , indeed!
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 4:20 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 3:16 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:57 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?
lee -- 3/16/2000, 10:14 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
Scotty -- 3/17/2000, 1:42 am
- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
- Re: Teeny Tern?
- Re: Teeny Tern
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and wide
- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
- Re: Waldens
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
pete czerpak -- 3/14/2000, 7:56 am- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
mike allen ---} -- 3/13/2000, 11:34 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Kent LeBoutillier -- 3/13/2000, 6:56 pm- Got that old loving feeling
Jack -- 3/14/2000, 10:56 am
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Spidey -- 3/13/2000, 6:07 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 4:50 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Tony -- 3/13/2000, 5:06 pm- Ivory inlays?
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 5:42 pm- no ivory, please.
Paul G. Jacobson -- 3/14/2000, 9:19 pm- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
Ed Valley -- 3/16/2000, 12:47 pm- Re: no ivory, please.
Tony -- 3/15/2000, 5:46 pm - Re: no ivory, please.
- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
- no ivory, please.
- Ivory inlays?
- Re: Guillemot Photos - looking good
Mike Hanks -- 3/13/2000, 4:40 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Hank -- 3/13/2000, 4:32 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Ross Leidy -- 3/13/2000, 2:30 pm - Re: Nicely done
- Nicely done