Date: 3/17/2000, 12:52 pm
> How do you intend to use this short kayak? Do you want something with a
> decent amount of volume?
I intend to use it for day paddling on rivers and small lakes and ponds - all areas in which my Walden excels. Because the Walden proved to lack the tracking required for ocean conditions (more than 1-2 foot seas), I am building a CLC Patuxent 17.5 (the seat, backband and deckrigging go on this weekend). I intend to use the Patuxent for any overnight trips, as well as ocean and larger lake paddling. So volume with this small boat is not a major concern. For the deck design, low for easier rolling is more important than height for cargo (lunch, wallet, car keys is about it) volume.
I considered the "simple" solution of just getting a whitewater boat, which would give me all the easy rolling I could want. But those things don't track at all. I tried a couple, and about half the paddle strokes were just an attempt to keep the boat going straight, with frequent spontaneous spins.
I guess what I'm after is a Walden Vision hull (excellent tracking, speed and maneuverability for a 12.5' boat) with a whitewater deck (the Vision's high fore deck makes it very difficult to set up a roll, and the high aft deck makes it even harder to finish).
I realize this is a hybrid between a sea kayak (tracking and speed) and a whitewater boat (maneuverability and rollability). Because it's not a "normal" application, there may not be existing plans. After all, you don't see any fiberglass or kevlar 12' boats on the market. And if I can't find a plan, I will build a cedar strip replica of the Vision's hull (with some minor modifications) and a whitewater-style deck modified to fit the hull. I'll have a better idea of the desired deck layout once I get the Patuxent in the water.
Ken
Messages In This Thread
- Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Shawn Baker -- 3/13/2000, 2:10 pm- Nicely done
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 1:47 pm- Re: Nicely done
Shawn Baker -- 3/14/2000, 1:56 pm- Re: Nicely done
Nolan -- 3/16/2000, 8:10 am- Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 2:59 pm- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Don Beale -- 3/15/2000, 11:50 am- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/15/2000, 11:58 am
- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
- Strip deck / S&G hull
- Re: Nicely done
- Photo Moratorium
Ken Finger -- 3/14/2000, 1:21 pm- Re: Photo Moratorium
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 8:58 am- Re: Waldens
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 11:33 am- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 12:31 pm- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 1:11 pm- Re: Short and wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:34 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 7:37 am- Re: Short and (not) wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 12:01 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 12:52 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 3:42 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 4:04 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 4:18 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 1:31 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 1:58 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 2:51 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:19 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Kelly Trehearne -- 3/17/2000, 4:19 am
- Re: A Wooden Vision - Back on Topic
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:10 pm- Re: A Wooden Vision , indeed!
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 4:20 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 3:16 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:57 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?
lee -- 3/16/2000, 10:14 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
Scotty -- 3/17/2000, 1:42 am
- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
- Re: Teeny Tern?
- Re: Teeny Tern
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and wide
- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
- Re: Waldens
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
pete czerpak -- 3/14/2000, 7:56 am- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
mike allen ---} -- 3/13/2000, 11:34 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Kent LeBoutillier -- 3/13/2000, 6:56 pm- Got that old loving feeling
Jack -- 3/14/2000, 10:56 am
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Spidey -- 3/13/2000, 6:07 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 4:50 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Tony -- 3/13/2000, 5:06 pm- Ivory inlays?
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 5:42 pm- no ivory, please.
Paul G. Jacobson -- 3/14/2000, 9:19 pm- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
Ed Valley -- 3/16/2000, 12:47 pm- Re: no ivory, please.
Tony -- 3/15/2000, 5:46 pm - Re: no ivory, please.
- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
- no ivory, please.
- Ivory inlays?
- Re: Guillemot Photos - looking good
Mike Hanks -- 3/13/2000, 4:40 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Hank -- 3/13/2000, 4:32 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Ross Leidy -- 3/13/2000, 2:30 pm - Re: Nicely done
- Nicely done