Date: 5/24/2000, 4:47 pm
: But the Attwood 500 gph pump I bought uses 1.4 amps @ 12v and 1.5 amps @
: 13.6v, the Rulemate uses 1.9 amps @ 12v and 2.5 amps @ 13.6v. The Attwood
: should have a longer battery life, but it doesn't have the float. The
: float switch can be added. Do we need a float switch to be turning the
: pump on when upside down in a roll (I seriously doubt I'll be rolling the
: triple)?
I figure my cockpit will hold around 100 gallons. At 400 GPH (figure a 1.5 foot head) that would take 15 minutes to empty. A 10 AH capacity sealed lead acid (gel cell) battery would power that (at 2 Amp rate) for 5 hours continuous. That's enough to empty my cockpit about 20 times. The battery weighs 4 pounds and cost $16. The pump $15, a switch and some wire. I wouldn't worry about sealing the battery (at 13.5 volts it's not going to produce much current when submerged unless it's in mud and mostely iron)
That is looking like a pretty good option! The weight is the only thing I don't like but a battery like this could be useful for other things also.
Doug
This link requires the acrobat reader
Messages In This Thread
- Bulkheads
Doug Kuik -- 5/22/2000, 10:44 am- Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach
mike allen ---> -- 5/23/2000, 8:28 pm- Re: Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach
Doug Kuik -- 5/24/2000, 5:58 pm
- Re: Bulkheads
Berkeley C. -- 5/23/2000, 1:02 pm- Re: Bulkheads
Jack Martin -- 5/24/2000, 6:14 am- Re: Bulkheads
Doug Kuik -- 5/23/2000, 6:54 pm- Re: Bulkheads
RM Dalton -- 5/23/2000, 1:40 pm - Re: Bulkheads
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers *Pic*
Shawn B -- 5/22/2000, 12:24 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
Doug Kuik -- 5/22/2000, 1:17 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
Shawn B -- 5/22/2000, 5:09 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
Doug Kuik -- 5/22/2000, 6:36 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers *Pic*
Shawn B -- 5/23/2000, 2:18 pm- An alternative to foot pump.
Dale Frolander -- 5/23/2000, 4:02 pm- Re: Electric pumps *Pic*
Shawn B -- 5/24/2000, 10:03 am- More POWERRRRRRR
Dale Frolander -- 5/24/2000, 1:27 pm- Re: More POWERRRRRRR
Doug Kuik -- 5/24/2000, 4:47 pm- it may be even more efficient
Paul G. Jacobson -- 5/25/2000, 12:35 am- Re: it may be even more efficient
Doug Kuik -- 5/25/2000, 12:22 pm- Re: it may be even more efficient
Spidey -- 5/28/2000, 11:33 pm- Re: that's a lotta weight!
Shawn B -- 5/25/2000, 2:05 pm - Re: that's a lotta weight!
- Re: it may be even more efficient
- Re: More POWERRRRRRR
Dale Frolander -- 5/24/2000, 10:03 pm- Wrong batteries
Dale Frolander -- 5/24/2000, 10:20 pm
- Re: it may be even more efficient
- it may be even more efficient
- Re: More POWERRRRRRR
- More POWERRRRRRR
- Re: Foot pumps
Doug Kuik -- 5/23/2000, 3:15 pm- Re: Foot pumps
David -- 5/24/2000, 9:07 am- Re: Foot pumps
Jack Martin -- 5/24/2000, 8:09 am- Re: Foot pumps
Jack Martin -- 5/24/2000, 6:47 am- Re: Rubber Ball Foot pumps
Shawn B -- 5/23/2000, 4:27 pm - Re: Foot pumps
- Re: Electric pumps *Pic*
- An alternative to foot pump.
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers *Pic*
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
- Re: Bulkheads
Dale Frolander -- 5/22/2000, 11:25 am - Re: Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach
- Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach