Date: 5/24/2000, 5:58 pm
: I like the idea of curving the glass. Like take Dale's dwg step #3 and fillet
: the low foam side (say its on the cockpit side) and add curved glass. Say
: 1in offset and radius. You get the stiffness of the foam, the security of
: glass and possibly up to 2 in of give. The glass is in tension for pump
: foot strokes or filled cockpit w/ water. Maybe use polyester, dynel or
: kevlar instead of glass for real flexibility w/o failure. Maybe (from
: hatch side) jam bulkhead in place (1in free all around) w/ scrap pcs of
: foam, spray expanding urethane foam all around the edge, fillet w/
: sandpaper from cockpit side, add glass fillets, scrape out foam from hatch
: side - only use the glass.
: Or if you really know the i/s profile at the bulkhead location, make it all
: up o/s the yak, and mask off the hanging edge of the glass. Unmask, push
: in place, and wet out the cloth just like 'painting' the i/s seam using
: Jay babina's approach.
: the bulkhead end grain should be sealed.
: -mick
The spray urethane foam is easily formed with sand paper but is incompressable when cured. Something like Kevlar at a 45 deg bias would provide plenty strength and flex.
Doug
Messages In This Thread
- Bulkheads
Doug Kuik -- 5/22/2000, 10:44 am- Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach
mike allen ---> -- 5/23/2000, 8:28 pm- Re: Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach
Doug Kuik -- 5/24/2000, 5:58 pm
- Re: Bulkheads
Berkeley C. -- 5/23/2000, 1:02 pm- Re: Bulkheads
Jack Martin -- 5/24/2000, 6:14 am- Re: Bulkheads
Doug Kuik -- 5/23/2000, 6:54 pm- Re: Bulkheads
RM Dalton -- 5/23/2000, 1:40 pm - Re: Bulkheads
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers *Pic*
Shawn B -- 5/22/2000, 12:24 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
Doug Kuik -- 5/22/2000, 1:17 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
Shawn B -- 5/22/2000, 5:09 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
Doug Kuik -- 5/22/2000, 6:36 pm- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers *Pic*
Shawn B -- 5/23/2000, 2:18 pm- An alternative to foot pump.
Dale Frolander -- 5/23/2000, 4:02 pm- Re: Electric pumps *Pic*
Shawn B -- 5/24/2000, 10:03 am- More POWERRRRRRR
Dale Frolander -- 5/24/2000, 1:27 pm- Re: More POWERRRRRRR
Doug Kuik -- 5/24/2000, 4:47 pm- it may be even more efficient
Paul G. Jacobson -- 5/25/2000, 12:35 am- Re: it may be even more efficient
Doug Kuik -- 5/25/2000, 12:22 pm- Re: it may be even more efficient
Spidey -- 5/28/2000, 11:33 pm- Re: that's a lotta weight!
Shawn B -- 5/25/2000, 2:05 pm - Re: that's a lotta weight!
- Re: it may be even more efficient
- Re: More POWERRRRRRR
Dale Frolander -- 5/24/2000, 10:03 pm- Wrong batteries
Dale Frolander -- 5/24/2000, 10:20 pm
- Re: it may be even more efficient
- it may be even more efficient
- Re: More POWERRRRRRR
- More POWERRRRRRR
- Re: Foot pumps
Doug Kuik -- 5/23/2000, 3:15 pm- Re: Foot pumps
David -- 5/24/2000, 9:07 am- Re: Foot pumps
Jack Martin -- 5/24/2000, 8:09 am- Re: Foot pumps
Jack Martin -- 5/24/2000, 6:47 am- Re: Rubber Ball Foot pumps
Shawn B -- 5/23/2000, 4:27 pm - Re: Foot pumps
- Re: Electric pumps *Pic*
- An alternative to foot pump.
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers *Pic*
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
- Re: Bulkheads without Stress Risers
- Re: Bulkheads
Dale Frolander -- 5/22/2000, 11:25 am - Re: Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach
- Another nonstress riser bulkhead approach