Re: Umm...Dale... *Pic*
By:Shawn B
Date: 6/22/2000, 11:59 am
Date: 6/22/2000, 11:59 am
In Response To: Re: strip methods Moores vs Schade vs stitch (Dale Frolander)
: Nick, we need a Guillemot "L" with a swedeform shape. Now that
: would be one heck of a yak.
I think it already is!!
Notice that the hull lines converge much farther back on the aft section than they do on the fore section. The semi-hard chines also run farther aft than they do forward.
Just little subtle things that only a mother would notice! ;)
Shawn
Messages In This Thread
- strip methods Moores vs Schade vs stitch
Scott E. Davis -- 6/21/2000, 2:06 pm- Re: strip methods Moores vs Schade vs stitch
Shawn B -- 6/21/2000, 2:47 pm- Re: strip methods Moores vs Schade vs stitch
Dale Frolander -- 6/21/2000, 9:45 pm- Re: Umm...Dale... *Pic*
Shawn B -- 6/22/2000, 11:59 am- Re: Umm...Dale...
Dean Trexel -- 6/23/2000, 3:15 pm- Re: Motherhood
Shawn B -- 6/27/2000, 11:39 am
- Well, kinda
Dale Frolander -- 6/22/2000, 9:55 pm - Re: Motherhood
- Re: Umm...Dale...
- Re: Cockpit Size
Ken Finger -- 6/21/2000, 3:35 pm- Re: Cockpit Size
Shawn B -- 6/22/2000, 11:55 am
- Re: Umm...Dale... *Pic*
- Re: strip methods Moores vs Schade vs stitch
- Re: strip methods Moores vs Schade vs stitch