Date: 4/26/1998, 12:04 am
Now I understand, thanks Mark
> The following list of phrases and their definitions will help
> you to understand that mysterious language of science and engineering
>
> "IT HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN"... I didn't look up the original
> reference.
> "A DEFINITE TREND IS EVIDENT"...These data are practically
> meaningless.
> "WHILE IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE DEFINITE ANSWERS
> TO THE QUESTIONS"... An unsuccessful experiment, but I still
> hope to get it published
> "THREE OF THE SAMPLES WERE CHOSEN FOR DETAILED STUDY"...
> The other results didn't make any sense.
> "TYPICAL RESULTS ARE SHOWN"... This is the prettiest
> graph.
> "THESE RESULTS WILL BE IN A SUBSEQUENT REPORT"... I
> might get around to this sometime, if pushed/funded.
> "THE MOST RELIABLE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED BY JONES"...
> He was my graduate student; his grade depended on this.
> "IN MY EXPERIENCE"... once
> "IN CASE AFTER CASE"... Twice
> "IN A SERIES OF CASES"... Thrice
> "IT IS BELIEVED THAT"... I think.
> "IT IS GENERALLY BELIEVED THAT"... A couple of other
> guys think so too.
> "CORRECT WITHIN AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE"... Wrong.
> "ACCORDING TO STATISTICAL ANALYSIS"... Rumor has it.
>
> "A STATISTICALLY ORIENTED PROJECTION OF THE SIGNIFICANCE
> OF THESE FINDINGS"... A wild guess.
> "A CAREFUL ANALYSIS OF ATTAINABLE DATA"... Three pages
> of notes were obliterated when I knocked over a glass of beer.
> "IT IS CLEAR THAT MUCH ADDITIONAL WORK WILL BE REQUIRED
> BEFORE A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS PHENOMENA OCCURS"...
> I don't understand it.
> "AFTER ADDITIONAL STUDY BY MY COLLEAGUES"... They don't
> understand it either.
> "THANKS ARE DUE TO JOE BLOTZ FOR ASSISTANCE WITH THE EXPERIMENT
> AND TO ANDREA SCHAEFFER FOR VALUABLE DISCUSSIONS"... Mr. Boltz
> did the work and Ms. Shaeffer explained to me what it meant.
> "A HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT AREA FOR EXPLORATORY STUDY"...
> A totally useless topic selected by my committee.
> "IT IS HOPED THAT THIS STUDY WILL STIMULATE FURTHER INVESTIGATION
> IN THIS FIELD"... I quit.
>
Messages In This Thread
- Re: You really don't want to look here
Mark Kanzler -- 4/20/1998, 11:32 am- How many wooden boats fail?
Keith Kaste -- 4/20/1998, 10:22 pm- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
Brian Millington -- 4/21/1998, 12:50 pm- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
Mark Kanzler -- 4/22/1998, 10:17 am- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
Brian Millington -- 4/23/1998, 1:23 am- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
Mark Kanzler -- 4/22/1998, 11:38 am- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
Brian Millington -- 4/26/1998, 12:04 am
- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
Rick C. -- 4/22/1998, 12:40 pm - Re: How many wooden boats fail?
- Re: How many wooden boats fail?
- Re: You really don't want to look here
Nick Schade -- 4/20/1998, 5:12 pm - Re: How many wooden boats fail?
- How many wooden boats fail?