: Hi Art, got a philosophical George-like conundrum: Since this small field of
: reality (one to one correspondence of ones standards with ones work) is
: confined to that one persons perception couldn't perfection be enjoyed as
: such? But when that perfection gets translated into a collection of words
: the "perfection" is null. Kind of like talking about the nature
: of God. Truly Georges confusion over where he starts and others begin is
: evident but it's making me wonder about that one hand clap

: where does the reflection go when sanding over shiny varnish, going,
: going,,,,gone. I think its perfect before the varnish goes on.

lee,

Yes, perfection can be enjoyed by society in its entirety through perception contraception. As long as people keep their perception to themselves, all is well.

To achieve perfection by this new standard, all one has to do is set one's standards suitably low, and you can achieve perfection in all aspects of life. For instance, I can seek out the perfect woman, although I may have to artificially lower my standards through the use of alcohol-based "solvents".

Words cannot in themselves describe perfection, for language is inherently imperfect by our new definition of perfection (unless of course you designed the language you use to describe perfection yourself - to your standards).

Perfectly, Art (Imitating Life)

p.s. "One hand clap" eh? Sounds like the venereal disease of the terminally lonely.