Date: 9/25/2000, 12:56 pm
: I noticed you’re knees over the stringers where they cross the forms. Great
: idea. There is just too much tension from the twisting torc of the
: stringers on the forms. If I decide to make another set of forms, I’ll use
: plywood instead of particleboard.
I agree. At least 3/4 particle would be better. The "knees", or clamps as I refer to them, worked well on all but the end forms. Just too much pressure there. It also needs modification to work well on the chines and gunwales. I didn't bother with it and just screwed them down >:-)
: It looks as if you are also going with a 2” thick stem. What were your
: criteria in deciding the shape of the stern and bow? The bows’ shape has
: nice transitions.
No real criteria. Just a piece of cardboard and "Hmmm. That looks good." They are longer than Putz suggests (by 7-8"), but will be trimmed off after placement of the gunwales. They will probably be similar in length to Mike's, which I believe are about 4" longer than Putz's.
: I’m also going to use your system this weekend for figuring floor shape and
: dimensions. I messed around with it for 4 hours and gave up. Your method
: looks solid.
This worked well in all cases except the end floors. Putz warns about these being the hardest. For those, I just winged it with cardboard first, then cut the wood. Some major compound cuts/double bevels there.
: Thanks for the ideas, Roger
Thanks for the comments!
Bill
Messages In This Thread
- Walrus in the works
Bill Price -- 9/24/2000, 10:56 pm- Re: Walrus in the works
Matt Thyer -- 9/25/2000, 2:20 pm- Re: Walrus in the works
Scotty -- 9/25/2000, 2:10 am- Re: Walrus in the works
Bill Price -- 9/25/2000, 1:02 pm
- Re: Walrus in the works
Roger Nuffer -- 9/25/2000, 1:47 am- Re: Walrus in the works
Bill Price -- 9/25/2000, 12:56 pm
- Re: Walrus in the works
- Re: Walrus in the works