Date: 9/30/2000, 11:24 am
Hi Pete,
I think that there are two different things here.
One is the basic strength of the component - in this case the grain orientation in the wood. The second is wood/fiberglass composite construction of a kayak hull where there is more than one factor to consider.
In simple form [like a bow limb] the material IS the structure and the only strength is that of the material. Strength can be tested with relatively simple approaches.
In a composite construction, the strength is derived from the materials AND the form. Both have to be considered together, testing is more complex. For example, a plain sheet of paper will not support its own weight when flat - fold it, open the sheet to form a 90 degree angle and the sheet of paper can easily support its own weight.
This is where I was comming from with my post. I just kinda junped in with my comments - if I missed the jist of your question - sorry for the confusion.
Hank
Messages In This Thread
- Grain Orientation v. Strength
Pete Roszyk -- 9/29/2000, 2:33 pm- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
Sam McFadden -- 10/6/2000, 7:36 pm- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
michelle -- 9/29/2000, 10:07 pm- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
Hank -- 9/29/2000, 8:35 pm- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
Pete Roszyk -- 9/30/2000, 1:32 am- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
Sam McFadden -- 10/6/2000, 7:45 pm- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
Hank -- 9/30/2000, 11:24 am- Shape factor
Sam McFadden -- 10/6/2000, 7:55 pm
- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
David Hanson -- 9/29/2000, 5:11 pm - Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength
- Re: Grain Orientation v. Strength