Re: Chesapeake 16LT
By:david
Date: 11/8/2000, 12:54 pm
Date: 11/8/2000, 12:54 pm
In Response To: Re: Chesapeake 16LT (Jenny Ellerbe)
Hi Jenny. I built my wife (5'3" - 120) a Ch. 16. She loves the boat and finds it very stable. I built the regular one because it's for touring, but the LT is same below the water line so should have the same stability. I photograph from my older Cape Charles 17 without much worry of the stability (which seems a little less than the Ch. 16), the biggest problem is accessing gear in the cockpit. So my advice? If your main purpose is to photograph, a boat like the Mill Creek would be a better choice. If it's to paddle and occasionally take pictures, go for the 16 LT and get good and comfortable in it before taking out the camera.
David
Messages In This Thread
- Chesapeake 16LT
Jenny Ellerbe -- 11/5/2000, 5:31 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Gini Linder -- 11/6/2000, 12:28 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Jenny Ellerbe -- 11/6/2000, 4:33 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Gini L. -- 11/8/2000, 7:43 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Jenny Ellerbe -- 11/8/2000, 8:56 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Brent Curtis -- 11/9/2000, 3:22 pm
- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
david -- 11/8/2000, 12:54 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Gini L. -- 11/7/2000, 10:13 am- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Jerry -- 11/6/2000, 11:52 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Peter H. -- 11/6/2000, 4:52 pm - Re: Chesapeake 16LT
- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Matthew -- 11/6/2000, 9:25 am- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Ronnie Earhart -- 11/6/2000, 8:52 am- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
peter czerpak -- 11/6/2000, 7:58 am- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Brent Curtis -- 11/5/2000, 8:29 pm- Re: Chesapeake 16LT
Ted -- 11/5/2000, 8:21 pm - Re: Chesapeake 16LT
- Re: Chesapeake 16LT