Date: 2/15/2001, 9:17 am
: Hi Elliot
: You are right in that the whole thing is about the forms lying straight and
: true. You can do it either way. If at all possible, try to straighten your
: strongback, but if the cutout in the forms is slightly larger than the
: size of the strongback, you can play that a little and still align the
: forms on it.
: Try to take out whatever bow you can in the strongback first. If it is rigid,
: but has a built in sag, attach it to the end forms first, with the beam
: turned over to see if you can affectively take the sag out by pressing it
: down into place. Then attach it to a third stand in the center. If it is
: bowed from side to side, then it may not be so easy unless the stands are
: heavy enough to pull the bow out. In any case, If you can't pull all of
: the bow or sag out, then you have another option.
: When you cut the forms out ( which you obviouly already have ) open the holes
: up a bit for the beam and you will be able to adjust them by moving them
: around on the beam, up and down or side to side, until they all line up.
: If the beam is twisted, this may also work.
: MY solution would be to build the beam again, as it IS very important and
: will save a lot of hassle adjusting everything, but, I realize that most
: folks can't afford to do that, so, the above options should help you get
: on with your Expidition. Hope this was of some help! I think you pretty
: much already had that figured out. Good Luck!
: Rehd
The beam itself is in great shape it is just the side to side thing constantly moving the forms a little here a little there. As you know im sure ,the beam is strongest vertically. however not as strong side to side. i am using 3 of the stands mentioned in the book so there is no sag there i will just have to shim the stands to make the strongback perfectly level as my basement floor is not. once i have the stands set i am wondering how to keep them in the proper plane so if i kick one it doesnt screw everything up again. I would hope anchoring the things to the floor is not the answer. Oh well such is life, thanks for responding Rehd. Elliott
Messages In This Thread
- String Marking Of Strongback
Elliott -- 2/15/2001, 7:35 am- String Align *Pic*
mike allen ---> -- 2/16/2001, 5:45 pm- Do I detect a low volume deck shape? Very cool *NM*
RUSS -- 2/17/2001, 9:15 am- Do I detect a low volume boat?
Russ -- 2/17/2001, 9:02 am- Re: Do I detect a low volume boat?
mike allen ---> -- 2/19/2001, 3:51 pm
- Re: 2nd the string thing *NM* *Pic*
Larry C. -- 2/16/2001, 8:57 pm - Do I detect a low volume boat?
- Re: String Marking Of Strongback
RUSS -- 2/15/2001, 5:20 pm- Re: String Marking Of Strongback
Ray Port Angeles -- 2/15/2001, 3:05 pm- Re: Rays response
Elliott Wagner -- 2/16/2001, 8:55 am- Re: String Marking Of Strongback
Ben Staley -- 2/15/2001, 3:48 pm- Re: Bens response
Elliott Wagner -- 2/16/2001, 9:05 am- Re: pls call me BEHN
Ben Staley -- 2/16/2001, 10:34 am
- Re: pls call me BEHN
- Re: String Marking Of Strongback
- Re: String Marking Of Strongback
Rehd -- 2/15/2001, 8:21 am- Re: Rehd
Elliott -- 2/15/2001, 9:17 am- A sore toe -- guaranteed
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/16/2001, 1:19 am- Re: A sore toe -- guaranteed
Elliott Wagner -- 2/16/2001, 8:53 am- You laughed? And I was serious.
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/18/2001, 11:10 pm- Re: You laughed? And I was serious.
daren -- 2/18/2001, 11:32 pm- And I forgot to add . . .
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/19/2001, 3:14 am- Re: And I forgot to add . . .
daren -- 2/19/2001, 9:28 pm- it has been tried, and it is more expensive
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/19/2001, 10:38 pm
- it has been tried, and it is more expensive
- Re: And I forgot to add . . .
- And I forgot to add . . .
- Re: You laughed? And I was serious.
- You laughed? And I was serious.
- Re: Rehd
Rehd -- 2/15/2001, 7:56 pm- Re: Rehds response
Elliott Wagner -- 2/16/2001, 8:48 am
- Re: A sore toe -- guaranteed
- A sore toe -- guaranteed
- Do I detect a low volume deck shape? Very cool *NM*
- String Align *Pic*