Date: 2/25/2001, 8:26 am
: Hi George;
: 72dpi is about where most people have their monitors set (800x600 for
: 15", 1024x768 for 17", 1280x1024 for 20", etc., close
: enough. It seems to work best if you start with a 300dpi pic, and use a
: paint program (I have used Paint Shop Pro for years) to do an intelligent
: resize to (i.e.) 800x600 after cropping and whatever. Lastly a sharpening
: is in order. This technique yields quick-loading, nice pics that fit 90%
: of all video setups out there. JPG compression ratios up to 35 or more
: preserve picture quality while shrinking file size, so it's best to check
: that setting as well in the paint program you're using.
: As to inline http locations for links, most bbs operators don't like that
: because it takes the surfer away from their pages - The link at the bottom
: of your post always opens a new window so you never really
: "leave" the KBBS, for instance . . . The original window will
: remain so they don't forget where they came from . . . A surfer can always
: right-click a link and select "open in new window," but few
: other than myself actually do that . . .
: Best Regards, Spidey
I still would like to know how to put 2 URL's into the Optional image URL box so they both come up in the same message. The URL's are from Photopoint. I know the html code to do it in E-mail but I cant get anything to work here. I have seen multiple images (from Photopoint) posted here. Any more ideas?
Thanx,
Larry C.
Messages In This Thread
- Another clamping gizmo. Don't watch, Rob 8-) *Pic*
Pete Rudie -- 2/23/2001, 2:21 pm- Thanks all, for the advice
Pete Rudie -- 2/23/2001, 8:28 pm- Spidey's way.
John Monfoe -- 2/24/2001, 4:31 am- Still baffled
Pete Rudie -- 2/24/2001, 12:44 pm- More baffled than ever *Pic*
Pete Rudie -- 2/25/2001, 9:06 pm- Re: It comes & Goes . . .
Spidey -- 2/25/2001, 9:34 pm- Maybe some single malt Scotch will help....
Pete Rudie -- 2/25/2001, 9:38 pm- Re: Maybe some single malt Scotch will help.... *NM*
Scott E. Davis -- 2/28/2001, 1:34 pm
- Re: One more way . . .
Spidey -- 2/25/2001, 9:38 pm- Re: One more way . . .
Pete Rudie -- 2/25/2001, 9:40 pm- Re: One more way . . .
Spidey -- 2/25/2001, 10:14 pm
- Re: One more way . . .
- Re: Maybe some single malt Scotch will help.... *NM*
- Maybe some single malt Scotch will help....
- Re: Still baffled
Ron Hagedorn -- 2/24/2001, 1:55 pm- Re: Still baffled
Geo. Cushing -- 2/24/2001, 11:08 pm- Re: Right On
Spidey -- 2/25/2001, 12:44 am- Re: The right button?
Geo. Cushing -- 2/25/2001, 10:14 am- bear with me~please
Larry C. -- 2/25/2001, 8:26 am- Re: bear with me~please
Spidey -- 2/25/2001, 9:27 am- Re: bear with me~please
Larry C. -- 2/25/2001, 12:29 pm- Re: bear with me~please
Rehd -- 2/25/2001, 2:15 pm- Re: Rehd & Larry . . .
Spidey -- 2/25/2001, 9:20 pm
- Re: Rehd & Larry . . .
- Re: bear with me~please
- Re: bear with me~please
- bear with me~please
- Re: The right button?
- Re: P.S. here's a link 8-)
Ron Hagedorn -- 2/24/2001, 2:50 pm- Thanks
Pete Rudie -- 2/25/2001, 12:28 am
- Re: What about multiple pics?
Larry C. -- 2/24/2001, 2:50 pm - Re: Right On
- Re: It comes & Goes . . .
- Peter pic prob.
Elliott Wagner -- 2/24/2001, 8:43 am- Re: Peter pic prob.
Pete Rudie -- 2/24/2001, 12:54 pm
- More baffled than ever *Pic*
- Still baffled
- Pic Problems might be due to file size
Ted -- 2/23/2001, 7:50 pm- Possible pic Problem?
Steve -- 2/23/2001, 6:28 pm- Re: Possible pic Problem?
Rehd -- 2/23/2001, 7:55 pm
- Re: Another clamping gizmo. Don't watch, Rob 8-)
Ron Hagedorn -- 2/23/2001, 5:44 pm- Re: Another clamping gizmo. Don't watch, Rob 8-)
Pete Rudie -- 2/23/2001, 6:03 pm- probs w/ me too.
mike allen ---> -- 2/23/2001, 6:09 pm
- probs w/ me too.
- Where's the PIC? *NM*
Steve -- 2/23/2001, 3:49 pm - Spidey's way.
- Thanks all, for the advice