Re: flex is good
By:Chris Luneski
Date: 4/8/2001, 2:05 am
Date: 4/8/2001, 2:05 am
In Response To: Re: flex is good (Lee Gardner)
: I was similarly surprised with the coho I made, and that was with 3layers of
: 4oz in the bottom, kind of neat to see something flex and be ok. I'm
: guessing that 3mmply with multiple layers of 4oz is a more optimum lay-up
: than 4mm with 6oz. from a strength/weight ratio just more labor intensive
: and may not be best for large panel shapes.
I should have said "oil canning". With a shallow V bottom and fairly narrow panels (4 per side, which makes 7 fillet "stringers") I don't think it will oil can the way a flat bottom might.
Thanks for the comments.
CL
Messages In This Thread
- ply thickness - glass weight tradeoff
Chris Luneski -- 3/30/2001, 2:28 am- Re: ply thickness - glass weight tradeoff
Al Gunther -- 3/31/2001, 10:55 am- Re: ply thickness - glass weight tradeoff
Geo. Cushing -- 3/30/2001, 5:21 pm- Re: flex is good
Dean Trexel -- 3/30/2001, 9:37 am- Re: flex is good
Lee Gardner -- 3/30/2001, 2:35 pm- Re: flex is good
Chris Luneski -- 4/8/2001, 2:05 am
- Re: flex is good
- Re: ply thickness - glass weight tradeoff
- Re: ply thickness - glass weight tradeoff