Ben,
That sounds like it will be somewhere in between the height of my Skinny Walrus and the Plywood Walrus. It should help make it easy to roll. If you plan on using it for camping, you may want to go back to the original sheer height amidships or build a raised deck, but for day trips it should be perfect.
Mike
: Well, I wasn't sure what point to measure from so here are two: At form 4
: which should be the back of the cockpit I had 6-1/2" from bottom of
: the keel to top of sheer stringer.
: I also measured the distance from chine to sheer at the same point and got
: 6".
: Minor setback last evening, one of my sheer stringers popped the scarf joint
: loose. Fortunately I hadn't glued it to the bow and stern yet, it was just
: clamped in place so I was able to take it back off and reglue it.
: I've been busy planing the stringers so the panels will lay flush.
Messages In This Thread
- Mike Hanks, Plywood walrus question
Ben Staley -- 8/30/2001, 11:43 am- Re: Mike Hanks, Plywood walrus question
Mike Hanks -- 8/30/2001, 8:13 pm- Re: walrus/Cunningham comparison
LeeG -- 8/31/2001, 2:40 pm- Re: walrus/Cunningham comparison
Mike Hanks -- 9/2/2001, 8:37 am- Re: walrus/Cunningham comparison
LeeG -- 9/2/2001, 9:02 pm
- Re: walrus/Cunningham comparison
- Re: Mike Hanks, Plywood walrus question
Ben Staley -- 8/31/2001, 10:45 am- Re: Mike Hanks, Plywood walrus question
Mike Hanks -- 9/2/2001, 8:23 am
- Re: walrus/Cunningham comparison
- Re: walrus/Cunningham comparison
- Re: Mike Hanks, Plywood walrus question