good comparison
By:mike allen --->
Date: 9/11/2001, 11:52 am
Date: 9/11/2001, 11:52 am
In Response To: Georgian Bay vs. Return: A comparison *Pic* (Shawn Baker)
a good comparison shawn. nice adjunct of pics of the 2 yaks. they show clear fundamental differences from the outset. they deviate in plan (aspect),side profile (greatly-esp rear),section and section relationships. the approach to fittings is also fundamentally different.
i see other similarities of both to other yaks,not each other.
i am quite sympathetic to the idea of giving credit where credit is appropriate but i just don't see it here unless everyone give credit to everyone.
-mick
Messages In This Thread
- Re: Georgian Bay
Rob Macks -- 9/10/2001, 5:27 pm- Georgian Bay vs. Return: A comparison *Pic*
Shawn Baker -- 9/10/2001, 7:48 pm- good comparison
mike allen ---> -- 9/11/2001, 11:52 am- fair posting
pete czerpak -- 9/11/2001, 4:50 am- Re: well said
daren neufeld -- 9/10/2001, 11:23 pm- Re: Georgian Bay vs. Return: A comparison
100GRIT -- 9/10/2001, 9:05 pm - fair posting
- Hmmmmmmmmmmmm....................................
Pete Rudie -- 9/10/2001, 5:38 pm- Re: Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.................................
Rob Macks -- 9/10/2001, 6:32 pm- Maybe you could tell us what the similarities are
Pete Rudie -- 9/11/2001, 2:05 pm- No answer? I thought so. *NM*
Pete Rudie -- 9/13/2001, 10:29 am- Re: No answer? I thought so.
Rob Macks -- 9/13/2001, 3:14 pm- Re: No answer? I thought so.
Pete Rudie -- 9/13/2001, 4:30 pm
- Re: No answer? I thought so.
- Re: No answer? I thought so.
- Re: Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.................................
Craig Bumgarner -- 9/11/2001, 9:06 am - No answer? I thought so. *NM*
- Maybe you could tell us what the similarities are
- good comparison
- Georgian Bay vs. Return: A comparison *Pic*