Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
By:jim champoux
Date: 8/17/1998, 9:48 am
Date: 8/17/1998, 9:48 am
In Response To: Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique (Mike Scarborough)
it may have been more of a heat reaction than a chemical one. Just a guess though
Messages In This Thread
- George Roberts' Sealing Technique
John Pane -- 8/15/1998, 12:54 am- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
Jay Babina -- 8/15/1998, 11:07 am- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
L.C. -- 8/15/1998, 5:42 pm- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
Jay Babina -- 8/17/1998, 9:56 am- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
Mark Kanzler -- 8/17/1998, 1:41 pm- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
Nick Schade -- 8/17/1998, 2:34 pm
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
Nick Schade -- 8/14/1998, 1:46 pm- bubbles under glass
Paul Stomski -- 8/14/1998, 3:08 pm- Re: bubbles under glass
Nick Schade -- 8/14/1998, 8:48 pm- Re: bubbles under glass
Mike Scarborough -- 8/14/1998, 6:39 pm - Re: bubbles under glass
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
NPenney -- 8/14/1998, 2:15 pm - Re: bubbles under glass
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
jim champoux -- 8/14/1998, 1:42 pm- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
Mike Scarborough -- 8/14/1998, 6:35 pm- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
jim champoux -- 8/17/1998, 9:48 am
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique
- Re: George Roberts' Sealing Technique