Date: 8/17/1998, 6:45 pm
> Kevlar works due it nature of being extremely difficult to tear.
> Unfortunately it is also easy to cut. This is why (in concert with
> its light weight) kevlar is ideal for bullet proof vests. I would
> propose that the fencer's blade had a "relatively" sharp
> edge/point where it happened to make contact with his opponent's kevlar
> protection, therefore going through the fabric with relative ease...
>
I don't make a habit of attacking kayaks with foils or epees. However, I'm leaning towards a kevlar skin-on-frame and I wonder about the issue of impacts/cuts, especially after reading threads about tortuous landings. ;-)
The high fuzzy-carpet factor of kevlar should handle rock and sand abrasion. What about "relatively sharp edge/point" damage? A rub strip would minimize risk of damage on the keel but the side fabric is on its own.
How is this damage minimized with other skin/frame combinations? An obvious solution is to use two layers, oriented at a right angle. Another is to use kevlar tape where damage potential is large. Is there such a thing as rip-stop kevlar (or is that bidirectional)? Alternate question: does it matter?
KTK
Messages In This Thread
- kevlar again
Stephen Bumb -- 8/16/1998, 10:35 pm- Re: kevlar again
Pete Jung -- 8/18/1998, 11:43 am- Re: kevlar again
Mark Kanzler -- 8/18/1998, 1:07 pm
- Re: more kevlar
Karl Kulp -- 8/17/1998, 10:39 am- Re: more kevlar
Mark Kanzler -- 8/17/1998, 11:55 am- Re: more kevlar
Martin Foil -- 8/17/1998, 4:52 pm- Re: more kevlar
Karl Kulp -- 8/17/1998, 6:45 pm
- Re: more kevlar
- Re: more kevlar
- Re: kevlar again
- Re: kevlar again