: . . . As for my S&G's, they'll be around for at
: least as long as I am - they're easy to maintain and repair.
I seem to recall pictures of one of your S&Gs when it was in 7 pieces (do I have that number right?) and again when it was reassembled. Some dam(n?) encounter or another. So I guess they'll be around as long as you are ....there to rebuild them. Otherwise, I'd say you have already outlived at least one boat. And that is probably as it should be.
: My strippers
: (once they are all built) will last just as long but I most certainly will
: NOT bang 'em up on the rocks/logs/waterfalls/rock gardens, etc.
Don't be shy about getting into tough places with a stripper. You don't need to baby them. While the idea of a boat built from strips of wood sounds like it would be a fragile craft, the same could be said about boats covered with birchbark, animal hides, canvas, 3.2 ounce dacron, thin vinyl, and blue poly tarps. Yet boats have been built from these materials, and they have proven to be quite durable.
It seems to defy reason, but if you take a look at some of the testing done on panels of wood strips you'll see that those made with thinner slices of wood are more flexible, and could prove to be more durable. Instead of hitting a rock and having the hull crack, it would bend, and the boat would bounce off.
Sharp rock edges will slice thru the bottom of aluminum canoes, and they'll certainly slice thru fiberglass coverings on any wood boats. With rounded rocks you have a good chance to slide off. My canoe has certainly bounced off many! Until recently I've just patched the gouges, buffed out the scratches and revarnished. Right now the canoe is going thru a refit and I'm going to re "glass" the bottom of the boat with a dacron cloth. I figured I might as well play with something different. In removing the old glass I wsa amazed at how thick it actually was, and at how little real damage it had sustained over 10 years.
You are playing with "slippery" coatings for the bottoms of your boats, and I suggest you try something like that on the bottom of your stripper. I think you'll find it even more effective on the rounder hull of a stripper than on a plywood boat. And then I think you'll surprise yourself at how durable those strippers are.
Why not build two strippers? One for show, and one for hard use?
Just a thought.
PGJ
PGJ
Messages In This Thread
- S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
john faas -- 10/3/2007, 1:58 pm- makes no sense
LeeG -- 10/9/2007, 8:20 am- Re: makes no sense
HenkA -- 10/9/2007, 10:47 pm- Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/11/2007, 1:01 pm- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Bryan Hansel -- 10/11/2007, 7:18 pm- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Bill Hamm -- 10/11/2007, 8:00 pm- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass *LINK* *Pic*
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 10/12/2007, 8:02 am- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Bill Hamm -- 10/12/2007, 8:17 am- I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/12/2007, 11:05 am- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
Bill Hamm -- 10/12/2007, 3:52 pm- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
Mike Savage -- 10/12/2007, 2:04 pm- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 10/12/2007, 11:25 am- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/12/2007, 11:57 am- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 10/12/2007, 12:18 pm
- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 10/12/2007, 10:36 am- fix up your Pal
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/12/2007, 11:47 am- Re: fix up your Pal
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 10/12/2007, 12:16 pm- Re: fix up your Pal
Bill Hamm -- 10/12/2007, 3:46 pm- Re: fix up your Pal
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 10/14/2007, 8:19 am
- Re: fix up your Pal
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/12/2007, 1:04 pm - Re: fix up your Pal
- Re: fix up your Pal
- Re: fix up your Pal
- Re: I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
- I'd like a side of ribs with a glass of resin
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass *LINK* *Pic*
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
TOM RAYMOND -- 10/11/2007, 6:00 pm- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Bill Hamm -- 10/11/2007, 5:02 pm- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
John Monroe -- 10/13/2007, 6:38 am- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Bill Hamm -- 10/13/2007, 7:17 am
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/11/2007, 6:48 pm- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
Bill Hamm -- 10/11/2007, 7:58 pm
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
- Re: makes no sense
Bryan Hansel -- 10/10/2007, 12:32 pm- Re: makes no sense
Robert N Pruden -- 10/10/2007, 8:12 pm- Re: makes no sense
TOM RAYMOND -- 10/11/2007, 11:41 am- Re: makes no sense
Bill Hamm -- 10/11/2007, 2:51 am - Re: makes no sense
- re. ten pounds less
LeeG -- 10/10/2007, 12:55 pm - Re: makes no sense
- Re: makes no sense
Bill Hamm -- 10/10/2007, 1:38 am- Re: makes no sense
HenkA -- 10/10/2007, 10:39 pm- Re: makes no sense
Bill Hamm -- 10/11/2007, 2:48 am- Re: makes no sense
HenkA -- 10/11/2007, 3:46 pm- Re: makes no sense
Bill Hamm -- 10/11/2007, 2:49 am - Re: makes no sense
- Re: makes no sense
- Re: makes no sense
- Re: Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
- Yes, I'd trust a boat with NO inside glass
- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
HenkA -- 10/4/2007, 8:25 pm- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
HenkA -- 10/4/2007, 10:44 pm- Re: S&G: (Link to thread: Which gives stronger boa *LINK*
HenkA -- 10/4/2007, 10:34 pm- Re: S&G: (Link to thread: try again *LINK*
HenkA -- 10/4/2007, 10:55 pm
- Two links to tests of strip & S&G
Glen Smith -- 10/4/2007, 8:54 pm- Re: Two links to tests of strip & S&G
Robert N Pruden -- 10/4/2007, 9:58 pm
- Re: S&G: (Link to thread: Which gives stronger boa *LINK*
- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
Bill Hamm -- 10/4/2007, 1:30 am- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
vk1nf -- 10/3/2007, 9:44 pm- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
Aaron -- 10/3/2007, 8:41 pm- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
Scott Baxter -- 10/3/2007, 7:49 pm- Disagree!
Robert N Pruden -- 10/3/2007, 6:43 pm- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
Charlie -- 10/3/2007, 5:39 pm- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/3/2007, 2:44 pm- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
Robert N Pruden -- 10/3/2007, 6:49 pm- durability not the issue. Think "ability" instead
Paul G. Jacobson -- 10/4/2007, 9:12 am- Re: durability not the issue. Think "ability" inst
Robert N Pruden -- 10/4/2007, 6:30 pm- Only one job? You'll go mad!!! *NM*
TOM RAYMOND -- 10/4/2007, 6:47 pm- Robert is gonna start writing his books
Robert N Pruden -- 10/4/2007, 7:06 pm- Re: Robert is gonna start writing his books
Ken Sutheland -- 10/6/2007, 6:24 pm
- Re: Robert is gonna start writing his books
- Robert is gonna start writing his books
- Only one job? You'll go mad!!! *NM*
- Re: durability not the issue. Think "ability" inst
- durability not the issue. Think "ability" instead
- Re: S&G: S & G less durable than strip-built
Bryan Hansel -- 10/3/2007, 2:17 pm - Re: makes no sense
- makes no sense