Boat Building Forum

Find advice on all aspects of building your own kayak, canoe or any lightweight boats

Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
By:David Reekie
Date: 1/10/2008, 6:44 am
In Response To: Re: Other: To V Or Not To V (Toni V)

Thanks Toni, those are very interesting thoughts, which make perfect sense. I had previously been thinking about the rake of the sides as just contributory to secondary stability, but you're right that there must be much more to it than that - and as you say, a nearly flat but narrow bottom, and very raked sides, is a very interesting option.

I've already got 'medium' raked sides on my design just hoping to improve the secondary, now you've given me some more thinking to do.

thanks!

dave

Messages In This Thread

Other: To V Or Not To V
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 4:51 am
Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/11/2008, 6:14 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Bryan Hansel -- 1/18/2008, 8:56 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/19/2008, 4:49 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom. *LINK*
Bryan Hansel -- 1/19/2008, 9:30 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/20/2008, 4:47 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Kris Buttermore -- 1/22/2008, 1:28 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Bryan Hansel -- 1/20/2008, 7:07 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Bill Hamm -- 1/17/2008, 8:10 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/18/2008, 5:18 am
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
Mike Savage -- 1/11/2008, 12:06 pm
Re: Why I wouldn't want a flat bottom.
John Monroe -- 1/12/2008, 4:14 am
Size matters with flat bottoms
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/12/2008, 4:15 pm
part 2 of above *Pic*
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/15/2008, 1:07 am
Re: part 2 of above
John Monroe -- 1/18/2008, 5:04 am
Re: part 2 of above
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/18/2008, 6:25 pm
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Bill Hamm -- 1/8/2008, 5:34 am
it goes deeper than a deep V *Pic*
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/7/2008, 10:42 pm
To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3+5m+
Jay Babina------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3+5m+ViUKBv -- 1/7/2008, 9:21 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
Bill Hamm -- 1/8/2008, 5:29 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3 *LINK* *Pic*
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 9:43 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
Tom Simpson -- 1/9/2008, 3:28 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3 *LINK* *Pic*
David Reekie -- 1/10/2008, 6:38 am
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
Tom Simpson -- 1/10/2008, 10:42 pm
Re: To V Or Not To V------WebKitFormBoundaryHGkfW3
David Reekie -- 1/16/2008, 3:53 am
V-hull or not
Jay Babina -- 1/7/2008, 10:21 am
Re: V-hull or not
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 12:18 pm
V-hull or not------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+kRZG
Jay Babina------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+kRZGKWR -- 1/7/2008, 12:29 pm
Re: V-hull or not------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+
Toni V -- 1/8/2008, 2:11 pm
Re: V-hull or not------WebKitFormBoundarygF0AAApM+
Mike Savage -- 1/8/2008, 6:46 pm
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
skiffrace -- 1/7/2008, 8:04 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 9:24 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
skiffrace -- 1/7/2008, 9:53 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Dave Reekie -- 1/7/2008, 10:26 am
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
Toni V -- 1/8/2008, 2:05 pm
Re: Other: To V Or Not To V
David Reekie -- 1/10/2008, 6:44 am