Boat Building Forum

Find advice on all aspects of building your own kayak, canoe or any lightweight boats

You could skip a step
By:Dan Ruff
Date: 11/8/2001, 9:23 am
In Response To: PolaroidDigital.com is free and easy. *Pic* (John Monfoe)

: The picture below isn't of good quality but I wanted some pictures of Rob
: Macks Shooting Star to look at when I start building. Rob had pictures
: posted on this board, so I took my camera with the flash off and took
: several pictures of the monitor screen, cropped them and sent them to
: polaroiddigital.com and ordered photos of them to look at while building.
: They somehow seem to be able to give you a better quality picture then you
: have stored with them.

You could have skipped a step and gotten a better image at the same time. If you see a picture on the web that you like, you can right click on it, and save it to your own computer. Just pay attention to where you save it. Then you can send it to polaroiddigital as usual for them to print out. This will give you a much sharper image than taking a picture of your monitor with a digital camera.

I agree with you that Polaroiddigital.com is great. People have little excuse for not posting pictures.

-Dan

Messages In This Thread

Off Topic: Kodak DC5000 and memory are now dirt cheap *Pic*
Dale Frolander -- 11/7/2001, 9:47 pm
PolaroidDigital.com is free and easy. *Pic*
John Monfoe -- 11/8/2001, 6:41 am
You could skip a step
Dan Ruff -- 11/8/2001, 9:23 am
Re: You could skip a step- I didn't know that. Thk *NM*
John Monfoe -- 11/9/2001, 6:47 am
Re: You could skip a step
Rob Macks -- 11/8/2001, 10:06 am
What did I start... Sorry.
John Monfoe -- 11/9/2001, 6:45 am
Re: What did I start... Sorry.
Rob Macks -- 11/9/2001, 9:16 am
Re: You could skip a step
Pete Rudie -- 11/8/2001, 11:31 am
Off Topic:Copyright
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/8/2001, 2:04 pm
I thought we learned from Napster OT
Paul G. Jacobson@aol.com -- 11/8/2001, 11:41 pm
Re: Off Topic:Copyright
David Hanson -- 11/8/2001, 4:45 pm
Right, no fights here ;) *NM*
Chip Sandresky -- 11/8/2001, 4:53 pm
Re: Well, that's interesting!
Don Beale -- 11/8/2001, 2:48 pm
Re: You could skip a step
Jim McKay -- 11/8/2001, 12:06 pm
Off Topic: Usage
Chip Sandresky -- 11/8/2001, 1:58 pm
If you have any legal authority for that position,
Pete Rudie -- 11/8/2001, 12:54 pm
Re: like footnotes
Dean Trexel -- 11/8/2001, 6:22 pm
Re: If you have any legal authority for that posit
Rob Macks -- 11/8/2001, 1:21 pm
Lighten up!
Pete Rudie -- 11/8/2001, 4:07 pm
Re: Hold it guys....
Shawn Baker -- 11/8/2001, 4:29 pm
Re: Hold it guys....
100GRIT -- 11/8/2001, 4:50 pm
Re: That's the problem with assumptions...
Shawn Baker -- 11/8/2001, 6:59 pm
Re: A good example of why...
Don Beale -- 11/8/2001, 7:55 pm
Re: Yup. *NM*
Shawn Baker -- 11/9/2001, 10:44 am
Re: Lots better choices for your money.
Peter -- 11/8/2001, 1:25 am
But it's a Canon
Dale Frolander -- 11/8/2001, 3:08 am
Re: Here's what I'm doing *Pic*
Roger Nuffer -- 11/8/2001, 2:42 am
120 scans at home
Paul G. Jacobson -- 11/8/2001, 4:00 pm
Re: That's a good way to go but...
Chip Sandresky -- 11/8/2001, 2:50 pm
Re: Scans from 120
David Marx -- 11/8/2001, 11:07 am
Re: Here's what I'm doing
Dan Ruff -- 11/8/2001, 10:08 am
Re: Here's what I'm doing
Dale Frolander -- 11/8/2001, 3:59 pm
Re: Here's what I'm doing
Bryan Sarauer -- 11/8/2001, 11:05 am
Re: Here's what I'm doing
Dan Ruff -- 11/8/2001, 12:08 pm
Re: Here's what I'm doing
Dale Frolander -- 11/8/2001, 3:53 pm
Re: Here's what I'm doing
Dan St. Gean -- 11/8/2001, 9:09 am
$250 dirt?! :) *NM*
Dean Trexel -- 11/7/2001, 10:48 pm
For decent digital camera, yes dirt. *NM*
Dale Frolander -- 11/8/2001, 1:03 am