: hi brian
: looks like west has it covered
: but it make sense me on volume to volume that if the sheer is wider toward
: the ends that there more likely would be more secondary stability at this
: section cut. it would depend on the cg and ctr of bouyancy for the section
: but i think there's a good chance it would be better.
That was my reasoning, too.
: i wonder if your seat is as low as it can go.
Yes it is, but it's not as low as it should be, due to an ill-placed rib.
: Is there anything that you can do to make it even a fraction lower.
Unfortunately, no. I wish there was, as it would certainly help.
: moving the stringers is a cool idea, but moving them down will make the
: 2ndary worse. If you move them up, the primary will get a little worse
: because of the more v hull but the volume will be redistributed to the
: sides giving more secondary. you also will be making less verticalish
: chine area to side seas and maybe the chop wouldn't hit so hard.
I understand what you're saying, but this is exactly the opposite of what the skin boat references I have say. However, I think that's due to the fact that the chine stringers can only be moved within a fairly narrow range if the necessary rib-skin clearance is to be maintained. In a low volume boat, they really can't be moved high enough to produce much of a V in the center of the hull.
Messages In This Thread
- Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Brian Nystrom -- 11/29/2001, 2:55 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/30/2001, 10:26 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Brian Nystrom -- 11/30/2001, 11:53 am- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
LeeG -- 11/30/2001, 2:06 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Brian Nystrom -- 11/30/2001, 3:14 pm- looking at those pictures...
risto -- 12/1/2001, 7:37 am- Re: looking at those pictures...
Brian Nystrom -- 12/3/2001, 12:23 pm- Re: looking at those pictures...
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/3/2001, 4:45 pm- Re: looking at those pictures...
Brian Nystrom -- 12/3/2001, 5:14 pm- Re: looking at those pictures...
Shawn Baker -- 12/5/2001, 5:47 pm- Re: looking at those pictures...
Brian Nystrom -- 12/6/2001, 12:13 pm
- Re: looking at those pictures...
John Haynes -- 12/5/2001, 1:23 pm- Re: looking at those pictures...
Greg Stamer -- 12/5/2001, 2:17 pm
- Re: looking at those pictures...
- Re: looking at those pictures...
- Re: looking at those pictures...
- Re: looking at those pictures...
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
LeeG -- 11/30/2001, 9:59 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Brian Nystrom -- 12/3/2001, 12:16 pm
- Re: looking at those pictures...
- looking at those pictures...
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 11/30/2001, 1:46 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Brian Nystrom -- 11/30/2001, 2:57 pm
- Very interesting article, Nick!
risto -- 11/30/2001, 12:49 pm- Re: Very interesting article, Nick!
Brian Nystrom -- 11/30/2001, 2:52 pm
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
mike allen ---> -- 11/29/2001, 6:40 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Brian Nystrom -- 11/30/2001, 11:25 am
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
West -- 11/29/2001, 6:08 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
Brian Nystrom -- 11/30/2001, 11:18 am
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Increasing Secondary Stability?