Date: 2/27/2002, 3:58 pm
What if you didn't put it on the deck at all - bed it in a vertical slot at the top of the bow stem. Gets it out of sight and if you run into a concrete wall, you hit the ring instead of wood. I guess would only be useful for a toggle attachement, not for deck lines. Oh well.
Ross
: I'm curious if there are any strong opinions about using a 1 1/2" ss.
: ring imbedded vertically in the bow as one might use a u-bolt. The reason
: for considering the ss. ring is that it would sit lower to the deck with
: less opportunity for fouling lines. u-bolts that have a big enough radius
: for 1/3-1/2 arc protruding are too large. Anyone see anyproblems with
: bedding the lower part in the endpour?
Messages In This Thread
- Material: ss. rings
LeeG -- 2/27/2002, 3:43 pm- Re: Material: ss. rings *Pic*
Chris Menard -- 2/28/2002, 8:22 am- Re: Material: ss. rings
LeeG -- 2/28/2002, 9:00 am- length (sometimes) matters
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/28/2002, 9:47 am- Re: length (sometimes) matters
LeeG -- 2/28/2002, 11:49 am
- Re: Material: ss. rings
Chris Menard -- 2/28/2002, 9:12 am - Re: length (sometimes) matters
- length (sometimes) matters
- Re: Material: ss. rings
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/27/2002, 8:01 pm- Re: Material: ss. rings
Severne -- 2/27/2002, 7:25 pm- Re: Material: ss. rings
Ross Leidy -- 2/27/2002, 3:58 pm - Re: Material: ss. rings
- Re: Material: ss. rings *Pic*