Re: Material: ss. rings *Pic*
By:Chris Menard
Date: 2/28/2002, 8:22 am
Date: 2/28/2002, 8:22 am
In Response To: Material: ss. rings (LeeG)
I don't understand the difference between a 1.5" diameter ring and a ubolt that has a threat-to-threat span of 1.5". Once the threads the ubolt or the bottom of the ring are embedded into the boat all you can see is a small part of the curve. Could you even tell what the embedded portion looked like?
Can you tell if I used a loop or a 'U'? I decided to extend the loop a little proud, but I could have buried it more, almost to the point of uselessness.
After attaching the u-bolt plate and bolts, I know that this boat could get hit dead on by a tank and that u-bolt will still be anchored into wood and epoxy.
Messages In This Thread
- Material: ss. rings
LeeG -- 2/27/2002, 3:43 pm- Re: Material: ss. rings *Pic*
Chris Menard -- 2/28/2002, 8:22 am- Re: Material: ss. rings
LeeG -- 2/28/2002, 9:00 am- length (sometimes) matters
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/28/2002, 9:47 am- Re: length (sometimes) matters
LeeG -- 2/28/2002, 11:49 am
- Re: Material: ss. rings
Chris Menard -- 2/28/2002, 9:12 am - Re: length (sometimes) matters
- length (sometimes) matters
- Re: Material: ss. rings
Paul G. Jacobson -- 2/27/2002, 8:01 pm- Re: Material: ss. rings
Severne -- 2/27/2002, 7:25 pm- Re: Material: ss. rings
Ross Leidy -- 2/27/2002, 3:58 pm - Re: Material: ss. rings
- Re: Material: ss. rings *Pic*