Date: 11/18/2002, 10:56 am
: I think the point at buttock 8 on station 9 should just be taken as defining
: the "cut off" line for the breakaway part of the form. Note that
: 5.22
: is also the height of the cockpit recess for that form. I simply did not
: connect that dot on the edge of the form, and it looks fine to me.
: Ditto for station 10, I think.
Thanks Ross,
I will go home and check out what you mean... yes, if that point is left out of the curve, it is fair. Is there anyplace in the book which I do not remember which points out how these numbers are to be used? I remember the need for the knock out (which was not necessary for the Great Auk.) This is so the cockpit surround can be glued in. I don't remember where it says how high the knockout should be.
Oh, it may be obvious that I have started in earnest on a Guillemot. I got sick of how ugly the folder was getting, and have lost interest in it for now. Instead I am wanting to see something beautiful rising from the shop floor. I may use the folder's cloth for a Tulik and a sea sock and use the pipes as antenna masts...
Rick
Messages In This Thread
- Strip: endforms and #2/#15 stations
Andrew Smith -- 11/17/2002, 5:17 pm- This error is not in the errata, couple more too.
Rick Allnutt -- 11/17/2002, 9:35 pm- Re: This error is not in the errata, couple more t
Ross Sieber -- 11/18/2002, 10:02 am- Nice theory.. time to check it out
Rick Allnutt -- 11/18/2002, 10:56 am- Re: Nice theory.. time to check it out
Ross Sieber -- 11/18/2002, 12:56 pm- I asked Nick about this a week ago or so
Rob Peterson -- 11/18/2002, 6:20 pm
- I asked Nick about this a week ago or so
- Re: Nice theory.. time to check it out
- Nice theory.. time to check it out
- Re: This error is not in the errata, couple more t
- This error is not in the errata, couple more too.