Date: 2/19/2003, 3:54 pm
Good point however, 3,2 oz triaxial glass is made for surfboards and model airplanes. Good, and QUICK wet-out, but not too tight.
Using the standard 6 oz S-glass, the ubiquitous stuff we all use, it fails as well as the light stuff. Just in case, I did a test using the tape and regular roll glass, same results that led to failures.
take a peep at my reply to Jay's thoughts. It's something to do with the epoxy for sure. Yale thinks it could be the accelerator, I'm sensing it's the resin dilutants, or a series of contributing chemicals reactions.
: okay, one last stab.
: you are using some really light tri-axial cloth right, is it that the weeve
: to too tight and you are not getting a thourough matrix but a simple
: laminar sandwich??
: What happens when you go to a courser cloth?
Messages In This Thread
- Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Mike and Rikki -- 2/16/2003, 10:07 pm- Possibly incompatible?
Rod Tait -- 2/17/2003, 11:53 am- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Shawn Baker -- 2/17/2003, 11:28 am- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Mark Normand -- 2/17/2003, 10:08 am- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Chip Sandresky -- 2/17/2003, 2:36 am- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Mike and Rikki -- 2/17/2003, 1:31 pm- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
emmett bowen -- 2/17/2003, 11:04 pm- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Mike and Rikki -- 2/18/2003, 12:09 am
- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
- Re: Plane repairs
Shawn Baker -- 2/17/2003, 11:26 am- Re: Garrett Wade did me a big favor
Chip Sandresky -- 2/18/2003, 4:03 pm- Re: Garrett Wade did me a big favor
Mike and Rikki -- 2/19/2003, 3:57 pm- Re:Garrett Wade service & Chip's lucky day
Scott Ferguson -- 2/18/2003, 6:56 pm- Re:Garrett Wade service & Chip's lucky day
Chip Sandresky -- 2/18/2003, 7:46 pm- Re:Updates regardless of success/failure
Scott Ferguson -- 2/19/2003, 12:23 pm
- Re:Updates regardless of success/failure
- Re:Garrett Wade service & Chip's lucky day
- Re: Garrett Wade did me a big favor
- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Jay Babina -- 2/17/2003, 8:14 am- The details...and alternative ideas
Mike and Rikki -- 2/17/2003, 1:19 pm- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Jeff The Tall -- 2/17/2003, 5:13 pm- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Mike and Rikki -- 2/17/2003, 6:44 pm- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Shawn Baker -- 2/17/2003, 7:33 pm- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Mike and Rikki -- 2/17/2003, 9:35 pm- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Jeff The Tall -- 2/19/2003, 3:13 pm- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Mike and Rikki -- 2/19/2003, 3:54 pm
- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Jay Babina -- 2/17/2003, 3:13 pm- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
Mike and Rikki -- 2/17/2003, 6:29 pm
- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
- Re: The details...and alternative ideas
- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Don Lucas -- 2/17/2003, 1:38 am- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Mike and Rikki -- 2/17/2003, 1:24 pm- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Bob Kelim -- 2/17/2003, 1:27 pm- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
Mike and Rikki -- 2/17/2003, 1:46 pm
- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
- Re: Epoxy: ^%$^%$$#% delamination
- Possibly incompatible?