Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric
By:Richard
Date: 4/8/2003, 1:16 pm
Date: 4/8/2003, 1:16 pm
I was laying out my kayaks last night using the method described in Cunningham’s book. After I had finished taking the measurements I checked them against the anthropometrics. I found that the backrest deck beam was 2 1/2" farther aft on mine and almost 3 1/2" aft on my wife’s. Is this a problem? Did I do something wrong?
Messages In This Thread
- Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric
Richard -- 4/8/2003, 1:16 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric
Brian Nystrom -- 4/8/2003, 1:54 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric
Richard -- 4/8/2003, 3:30 pm- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric
Brian Nystrom -- 4/9/2003, 12:16 pm
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric
- Re: Skin-on-Frame: Balnce VS Anthropometric