Hello Wayne,
Well, multiple reasons for this choice:
1. Aluminum corrodes.
2. Graphite flexes to fit the curve.
3. Strength to weight ratio.
4. Aluminum is bulkier. I can use a much smaller diameter graphite tube.
5. Graphite will not kink or dent under stress like aluminum will. (of course it has its limits and will break, but not as easily as aluminum will bend or dent.)
Let me know if you disagree, this is an experimental thing. That was the reason for my question. I want to be sure that I order a size that will allow enough bend to bend around the curve of the sheer, but not to allow too much flex. I used a fishing pole as comparison, and it seems even .5" graphite tube will flex well, and still remain quite rigid. My thoughts are that with graphite tube once broken down I will have a very compact and lightweight package, and won't have to worry quite as much about the tubes being damaged in shipping. This will probably be shipped a lot and/or checked as baggage. The light weight is more than just for ease of carrying, it's also cheaper to ship, especially internationally where shipping rates are higher per lb.
Thanks,
Malcolm
Messages In This Thread
- Skin-on-Frame: Graphite rods for folder... what size? *LINK*
Malcolm Schweizer -- 6/8/2003, 1:23 am- Rationale?
Wayne -- 6/8/2003, 11:32 pm- Re: Rationale?
Malcolm Schweizer -- 6/9/2003, 9:46 am- Re: Rationale?
Tom Yost -- 6/9/2003, 12:52 pm- Re: Rationale?
Dave -- 6/9/2003, 1:49 pm- Too funny!!! *NM*
Malcolm Schweizer -- 6/9/2003, 6:49 pm- Re: Rationale?
Tom Yost -- 6/9/2003, 2:08 pm - Re: Rationale?
- Too funny!!! *NM*
- Re: Rationale?
Tom Yost -- 6/9/2003, 12:35 pm- What? Aluminum over carbon? Huh?
Mike and Rikki -- 6/11/2003, 3:23 am- Re: What? Aluminum over carbon? Huh?
Tom Yost -- 6/11/2003, 3:46 pm- Re: What? Aluminum over carbon? Huh? *LINK*
Mike and Rikki -- 6/11/2003, 6:16 pm
- A "wonder" material does not a folder make !
Tom Yost -- 6/11/2003, 10:33 am- Some materials make more sense then others
Mike and Rikki -- 6/11/2003, 4:28 pm- Aluminum durability
Steve Juniper -- 6/12/2003, 12:06 am- Re: Some materials make more sense then others
Tom Yost -- 6/11/2003, 5:33 pm - Re: Some materials make more sense then others
- Aluminum durability
- Re: What? Aluminum over carbon? Huh? *LINK*
- Re: Rationale? *Pic*
Malcolm Schweizer -- 6/9/2003, 6:46 pm- anodising?
Pete Notman -- 6/10/2003, 4:54 am- Re: anodising?
Tom Yost -- 6/10/2003, 9:27 am- off topic - humble pies
Pete Notman -- 6/10/2003, 6:06 pm- Re: off topic - humble pies
Tom Yost -- 6/11/2003, 11:35 am- pies and anodizin in denver
Paul G. Jacobson -- 6/11/2003, 11:15 pm- Re: pies and anodizin in denver
Tom Yost -- 6/12/2003, 12:41 am- self-anodizing (alodine)
Steve Ulrich -- 6/12/2003, 8:59 am- Re: self-anodizing (alodine)
Tom Yost -- 6/12/2003, 9:14 pm
- Re: self-anodizing (alodine)
- self-anodizing (alodine)
- Re: pies and anodizin in denver
- pies and anodizin in denver
- Re: off topic - humble pies
- off topic - humble pies
- Re: Rationale?
Dave -- 6/9/2003, 10:37 pm- Re: Rationale?
Malcolm Schweizer -- 6/9/2003, 11:42 pm
- Re: Rationale?
Tom Yost -- 6/9/2003, 8:43 pm- Re: Beam me up
Malcolm Schweizer -- 6/9/2003, 10:20 pm- Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. *NM*
Arko Bronaugh -- 6/9/2003, 10:58 pm
- Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. *NM*
- Re: anodising?
- Re: What? Aluminum over carbon? Huh?
- Re: Rationale?
- Re: Rationale?
- Re: Rationale?
- Rationale?