Date: 8/21/2003, 11:29 pm
: Hi there, Sam.
: Well, I don't know... I did like the looks of my wooden dowel things, but
: they were a lot of bother to make, and then they had this sealing problem.
: So, if my interpretation of this thread is more-or-less on the mark, then I
: think a re-working is in order: I want an inexpensive, easy to make
: repeatedly, and simple system that has no sealing issues. And, of course,
: it has to do the job. So looks are not important right now.
: How about this?
: It's a 1/8" stainless rod bent into the shape shown. It sits in a bed of
: thickened epoxy all the way to the topside of the base part. On top of
: that is a 1" square of 5-oz. S-glass that was 'threaded' over the
: rod, so as to completely surround it.
: Think it'll work? Would a larger glass patch be an improvement? We won't know
: until tomorrow how much it'll hold.
: Cheers,
: Pete,
: in Snohomish
Hey Pete,
The hook looks pretty cool.
Use the largest bond area you can. This is one place where over-kill can provide a margin of safety with no real penalty. I'd guess that a 2 to 3 inch diameter patch would be good.
Something that coes to mind - lay-up the hooks on plastic sheet so you can trim the edges to a neat shape with scissors, then peel off the plastic and stick them in place. You probably already use/know that technique but others might not.
Cheers,
Sam
Messages In This Thread
- Epoxy: liddy hacthes
Sage -- 8/19/2003, 10:07 am- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
John D. -- 8/19/2003, 3:06 pm- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
Shawn Baker -- 8/19/2003, 12:02 pm- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
Marcel R. in Portland, Or. -- 8/19/2003, 12:42 pm- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
Shawn Baker -- 8/19/2003, 1:02 pm- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
Ted Henry -- 8/19/2003, 2:11 pm- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/19/2003, 2:10 pm- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
Shawn Baker -- 8/19/2003, 3:56 pm- Re: The next step, then?
Pete Roszyk -- 8/19/2003, 3:54 pm- Re: The next step, then?
Sam McFadden -- 8/20/2003, 12:51 am- Re: New Style Hook *Pic*
Pete Roszyk -- 8/21/2003, 4:24 pm- Re: New Style Hook
Sam McFadden -- 8/21/2003, 11:29 pm- Re: New Style Hooks Tested To Failure *Pic*
Pete Roszyk -- 8/22/2003, 1:16 pm- Re: New Style Hooks Tested To Failure
Sam McFadden -- 8/23/2003, 11:07 am- Re: CEUS Compared to old
Pete Roszyk -- 8/22/2003, 8:57 pm - Re: CEUS Compared to old
- Re: New Style Hooks Tested To Failure
- Re: New Style Hooks Tested To Failure *Pic*
- Re: New Style Hook
- Re: The next step, then?
john -- 8/19/2003, 8:32 pm- Re: The next step, then?
Shawn Baker -- 8/19/2003, 4:15 pm- Re: The next step, then?
Don Beale -- 8/19/2003, 6:31 pm- Re: The next step, then?
Kurt Loup, Baton Rouge -- 8/19/2003, 5:31 pm- choice of goo?
Larry -- 8/19/2003, 5:46 pm
- Re: The next step, then?
Sage -- 8/19/2003, 4:49 pm - Re: The next step, then?
- Re: New Style Hook *Pic*
- Re: The next step, then?
- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
- Re: Hooks a'poppin
Pete Roszyk -- 8/19/2003, 12:41 pm - Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes
- Re: Epoxy: liddy hacthes