Boat Building Forum

Find advice on all aspects of building your own kayak, canoe or any lightweight boats

Re: thanks all and a little history
By:John
Date: 8/29/2003, 10:36 pm
In Response To: Re: thanks all and a little history (C. Fronzek)

Sage,I've got the surfyak video also, but haven't started building yet, one reason is, I can't find any thing but crappy looking 3x7 Luann in my area, Greenville, NC, where are you located? Where did you buy your Luann?

: You asked the wrong question, Sage. You should have asked, "is luan as
: strong as British Standard marine plywood"? The answer is no. Most
: luan has wallpaper-thin outer verneers that contribut very little to the
: strength of the panel. And using 1/4 in. luan for anything requiring a
: hard bend is going to test the builder's patience and may not work in the
: end.
: The reason for the constant jabber about equal thickness verneers is that the
: strongest panels always have something close to this.
: You could probably build this hull lighter and stronger (and safer) with some
: BS ply.
: Charlie

Messages In This Thread

Material: luan vs okume
Sage -- 8/29/2003, 1:23 am
thanks all and a little history
Sage -- 8/29/2003, 2:34 pm
Re: thanks all and a little history
C. Fronzek -- 8/29/2003, 8:45 pm
Re: thanks all and a little history
John -- 8/29/2003, 10:36 pm
Re: thanks all and a little history
Sage -- 8/29/2003, 11:47 pm
so how about some pictures?
Dan Ruff -- 8/29/2003, 2:44 pm
Re: so how about some pictures? *LINK*
Sage -- 8/29/2003, 5:39 pm
Very Cool!
Grant -- 8/29/2003, 7:13 pm
Re: Very Cool! *LINK*
Sage -- 8/29/2003, 7:42 pm
Re: Material: luan vs okume
Scott Ferguson -- 8/29/2003, 11:43 am
Re: Material: luan vs okume
Don Lucas -- 8/29/2003, 10:50 am
Re: Material: luan vs okume
Jay Babina -- 8/29/2003, 10:26 am
Re: Material: luan vs okume
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 8/29/2003, 12:02 pm
Re: Material: luan vs okume
Shawn Baker -- 8/29/2003, 6:09 pm
Re: Material: luan vs okume
Joe -- 8/29/2003, 10:39 am
Re: Material: luan vs okume
Dan G -- 8/29/2003, 8:40 am