Re: Why?
By:Ted Henry
Date: 10/31/2003, 10:45 am
Date: 10/31/2003, 10:45 am
In Response To: Re: Why? (Mike Scarborough)
Mike,
6 oz. carbon is a much thicker fabric than 6 oz. glass, so it has much more volume for soaking up resin. Said another way, they are not physically similar fabrics other than weighing the same amount per yard. There was an interesting article in Sail magazine several months ago which explained the advantages of various fabrics very well. One message of the article was that for most boat building applications, s-glass has strength, durability, and weight advantages over CF.
Ted
: Why, at the same resin/fabric ratio would the carbon layup be heavier? Mike
: and Rikki indicate that carbon soaks up less resin that FG.
: Mike
Messages In This Thread
- Material: is CF lighter>
Jay Doorly -- 10/31/2003, 2:53 am- Summary
Jay Doorly -- 11/1/2003, 1:15 am- Also fame and prestige! *NM*
Sam McFadden -- 11/1/2003, 10:35 am
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Chuck -- 10/31/2003, 7:33 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
LeeG -- 10/31/2003, 10:29 am- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Sam McFadden -- 10/31/2003, 10:15 am- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Mike and Rikki -- 10/31/2003, 12:43 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
mike loriz -- 10/31/2003, 2:11 pm- How about Spectra??
Mike and Rikki -- 11/1/2003, 1:00 pm- Re: How about Spectra??
mike loriz -- 11/1/2003, 4:13 pm
- Re: How about Spectra??
- How about Spectra??
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
ChrisO -- 10/31/2003, 11:58 am- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
srchr/gerald -- 10/31/2003, 5:36 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter> *LINK*
srchr/gerald -- 10/31/2003, 12:15 pm - Re: Material: is CF lighter> *LINK*
- Re: Why?
Mike Scarborough -- 10/31/2003, 10:27 am - Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Re: Material: is CF lighter> *Pic*
Kyle T -- 10/31/2003, 8:09 am- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Mike and Rikki -- 10/31/2003, 5:02 am- Re: Material: is CF lighter> *LINK*
JeffHouser -- 10/31/2003, 11:31 am- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Mike and Rikki -- 10/31/2003, 12:54 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
ChrisO -- 10/31/2003, 1:09 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Malcolm Schweizer -- 10/31/2003, 6:32 pm
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Malcolm Schweizer -- 10/31/2003, 5:48 am- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Mike and Rikki -- 10/31/2003, 12:03 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Malcolm Schweizer -- 10/31/2003, 6:20 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Mike and Rikki -- 11/1/2003, 1:05 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Malcolm Schweizer -- 11/1/2003, 11:49 pm- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
Mike and Rikki -- 11/2/2003, 1:50 am
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
LeeG -- 10/31/2003, 10:32 am - Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Re: Material: is CF lighter>
- Also fame and prestige! *NM*
- Summary