Date: 10/31/2003, 2:49 pm
I'm about ready to glass the deck and found to my dismay that the 3.75 open weave s-glass from JRS does show significant weave ghosting on a sample I did yesterday. I used System 3 Clear Coat for wet-out and fill. Interestingly, the satin weave 6 oz. s-glass already on the hull does not show it. So what's the problem? While it is a very nice cloth, it can just about drive you nuts with it's love for holding onto microbubbles. I wanted something easier to deal with on the deck, but more ding resistant than many of the alternatives while keeping the boat reasonably light. Cost be damned. I use two layers of 3.25 satin on the previous boat. It looks good, and it's light, but not tough enough for the way I use the boat. So it goes. Looks like I'm headed for strength over appearance.
Ted
: Ryan,
: The photo shown here is of a couple of test panels made with 4 oz E glass and
: 4 oz S glass, taken in sunlight (4 oz plain weave E: BGF style 1522 -
: 24x22 with a 2-ply twisted yarn, and 4 oz plain weave S: BGF style 6522 -
: 24x22 made with a 2-ply twisted yarn). The side shown had two layers each,
: and one fill coat. What the photo shows is the difference in appearance
: between E glass and S glass. Both are clear, but the weave in the S glass
: is more visible. Some of the effect in this image is the interference
: (Moire) pattern caused by the two layers. Single layers of S glass simply
: show the repeating pattern of the weave.
: Have fun,
: Sam
Messages In This Thread
- Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Ryan -- 10/28/2003, 1:12 am- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question *Pic*
Sam McFadden -- 10/28/2003, 9:33 pm- Re: Material: My test sample confirms it
Ted Henry -- 10/31/2003, 2:49 pm- Re: Material: My test sample confirms it
Sam McFadden -- 10/31/2003, 4:30 pm
- Interesting shot, what's up with that?
Mike and Rikki -- 10/29/2003, 1:45 am- Its the difference
Sam McFadden -- 10/29/2003, 10:35 am- Re: Its the difference
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 10/29/2003, 1:49 pm- Re: Its the difference
Sam McFadden -- 10/29/2003, 11:38 pm- Re: Its the difference
Ryan -- 10/30/2003, 1:26 am
- Re: Its the difference
- Re: Its the difference
Mike and Rikki -- 10/29/2003, 12:24 pm- Re: Its the difference
Sam McFadden -- 10/29/2003, 12:56 pm- Re: Its the difference
Mike and Rikki -- 10/30/2003, 2:13 am- Re: Its the difference
Sam McFadden -- 10/30/2003, 10:37 am- Re: Its the difference
Mike and Rikki -- 10/30/2003, 11:57 am
- Re: Its the difference
- Re: Its the difference
- Re: Its the difference
- Re: Its the difference
- Re: Interesting shot, what's up with that?
LeeG -- 10/29/2003, 8:00 am- Got a possible reason for the 6522
Mike and Rikki -- 10/29/2003, 11:35 am
- Re: Its the difference
- Re: Material: My test sample confirms it
- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Chip Sandresky -- 10/28/2003, 12:45 pm- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Mike and Rikki -- 10/28/2003, 11:52 am- Please keep right on babbling.....
srchr/gerald -- 10/29/2003, 10:27 am
- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Jay Babina -- 10/28/2003, 7:25 am- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Dale -- 10/28/2003, 8:27 am- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Jay Babina -- 10/28/2003, 8:46 am- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Mike S -- 10/28/2003, 1:54 pm- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Jay Babina -- 10/29/2003, 8:48 am- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
Handy -- 10/29/2003, 10:52 am
- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question
- Re: Material: My test sample confirms it
- Re: Material: Another Glass Layup Question *Pic*