Date: 12/8/2003, 3:12 pm
while equally valid ( i hope ), an opposite way of looking at it would be to take the proportion of rise of 50% of the DWL from the baseline.
so in really rough terms if the waterline length was just over 16 feet(too bad a little more than most yaks), then 50% would be just over 8feet (100inches or so).
then if the rocker was 1" measured at this point, the dimensionless number would be also be 1%. so then using percentages to account for any length vessel, it is fairly readily transformed in our minds to a fairly typical boat length.
but it has some cons - usual measurment is taken (arbitrarily) closer to the ends than 25%dwl, and probably should be 50% around the cg not the ctr of the dwl, etc. too bad, but it speaks to me more than the usual.
Messages In This Thread
- Other: On measuring rocker
Mike Scarborough -- 12/6/2003, 10:41 am- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
Jay Doorly -- 12/10/2003, 3:10 am- beautiful mystery
Water Pixie -- 12/10/2003, 4:08 am
- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
Jay Doorly -- 12/7/2003, 1:25 am- rocking rockers
mike allen -- 12/7/2003, 2:26 am
- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
ChrisO -- 12/6/2003, 2:46 pm- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
Roger Turgeon -- 12/6/2003, 5:21 pm- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
Nick Schade - Guillemot K, ats -- 12/7/2003, 9:07 am- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
mike allen -- 12/8/2003, 3:12 pm
- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
Tom Yost -- 12/6/2003, 6:32 pm - Re: Other: On measuring rocker
- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
Pete Roszyk -- 12/6/2003, 11:41 am- Re: Other: On measuring rocker
LeeG -- 12/8/2003, 3:54 pm
- beautiful mystery
- Re: Other: On measuring rocker