Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
By:mike allen
Date: 12/10/2003, 2:32 pm
Date: 12/10/2003, 2:32 pm
In Response To: Re: Other: Rocker Revisited *LINK* *Pic* (Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks)
don't agree
you would get equal figures as in the other example i chose. but the question is do you or mike wish the same figures here?
but this may because i wish rocker to be the measurement of the curvature of the lower portion of the bottom.
i want draft to give me depth, rocker to give me curvature. my prejudice.
-mick
Messages In This Thread
- Other: Rocker Revisited
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 10:02 am- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited *LINK* *Pic*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/10/2003, 2:00 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Paul Jacob -- 12/11/2003, 3:52 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/11/2003, 4:50 pm
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 6:16 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 2:32 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/10/2003, 3:02 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 4:28 pm
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- one last time
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 12:28 pm- Keeping it simple
Mike Scarborough -- 12/11/2003, 11:11 am- Re: Keeping it simple and go for it!
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 11:54 am- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
Jay Doorly -- 12/11/2003, 1:33 pm- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 1:57 pm- rocker coefficient
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 3:47 pm- rocker coefficient explained
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 4:05 pm
- rocker coefficient explained
- rocker coefficient
- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
- Re: one last time
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 1:37 pm- deep rocker
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 2:22 pm
- Re: Keeping it simple and go for it!
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited *LINK* *Pic*