rocker coefficient
By:mike allen
Date: 12/11/2003, 3:47 pm
Date: 12/11/2003, 3:47 pm
In Response To: Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT! (mike allen)
: to get closish to this figure, i would take the dist betw the 50% depth
: locations and divide by the whole waterline length. that sorta
: approximates the lateral plane coef.
maybe call this the 'rocker coefficient' so it relates to a simplification of the lateral plane coef. (which itself is just a simplification of the shape).
Messages In This Thread
- Other: Rocker Revisited
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 10:02 am- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited *LINK* *Pic*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/10/2003, 2:00 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Paul Jacob -- 12/11/2003, 3:52 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/11/2003, 4:50 pm
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 6:16 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 2:32 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/10/2003, 3:02 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 4:28 pm
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- one last time
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 12:28 pm- Keeping it simple
Mike Scarborough -- 12/11/2003, 11:11 am- Re: Keeping it simple and go for it!
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 11:54 am- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
Jay Doorly -- 12/11/2003, 1:33 pm- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 1:57 pm- rocker coefficient
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 3:47 pm- rocker coefficient explained
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 4:05 pm
- rocker coefficient explained
- rocker coefficient
- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
- Re: one last time
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 1:37 pm- deep rocker
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 2:22 pm
- Re: Keeping it simple and go for it!
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited *LINK* *Pic*