With my designs at least, the keel shape is indeed a Bezier curve. The CAD system I use creates NURBS and they are a special form of Bezier curve.
While this would precisely define the shape of the keel, it is not really practical. Finding the parameters of the Bezier curve for non-computer designed boats would be a pain. And the parameters are not exactly something you can interpret by inspection. They would let you reproduce the curve on a computer, but what people want is a simple number they can look at and immediately say, "that boat has a lot/little rocker." The Bezier curve parameters don't do that.
: That seems like a good way to describe the rocker in very basic terms, but it
: doesn't allow for any of the complex curves the keel can describe that
: might occur for any given coefficient. Fore/Aft variations in rocker
: wouldn't be described well at all. It would work best for symmetric
: circular curves.
: Mike's bezier fuction would give that information exactly but who the hell
: wants to go back to re-learn their college math? Not me.
: I guess that's why rocker has defied easy description into the 21st Century.
Messages In This Thread
- Other: Rocker Revisited
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 10:02 am- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited *LINK* *Pic*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/10/2003, 2:00 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Paul Jacob -- 12/11/2003, 3:52 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/11/2003, 4:50 pm
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 6:16 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 2:32 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/10/2003, 3:02 pm- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 4:28 pm
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- one last time
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 12:28 pm- Keeping it simple
Mike Scarborough -- 12/11/2003, 11:11 am- Re: Keeping it simple and go for it!
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 11:54 am- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
Jay Doorly -- 12/11/2003, 1:33 pm- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 1:57 pm- rocker coefficient
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 3:47 pm- rocker coefficient explained
mike allen -- 12/11/2003, 4:05 pm
- rocker coefficient explained
- rocker coefficient
- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
- Re: Keeping it simple and defining IT!
- Re: one last time
Mike Scarborough -- 12/10/2003, 1:37 pm- deep rocker
mike allen -- 12/10/2003, 2:22 pm
- Re: Keeping it simple and go for it!
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited
- Re: Other: Rocker Revisited *LINK* *Pic*