Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4
By:Sam McFadden
Date: 12/29/2003, 7:10 pm
Date: 12/29/2003, 7:10 pm
In Response To: Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4 (Randy Knauff)
Randy,
I'd do what Lee suggested, and for the same reason.
Sam
Messages In This Thread
- Material: 2x4 > 6
Randy Knauff -- 12/28/2003, 3:56 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
srchr/gerald -- 12/28/2003, 10:38 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
Ron -- 12/29/2003, 11:39 pm- Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4
Randy Knauff -- 12/29/2003, 4:47 pm- Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4
srchr/gerald -- 12/29/2003, 7:18 pm- Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4
Sam McFadden -- 12/29/2003, 7:10 pm- Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4
LeeG -- 12/29/2003, 5:29 pm - Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4
- Re: Material: 4/6 or 6/4
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
Sam McFadden -- 12/28/2003, 7:40 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
Randy Knauff -- 12/28/2003, 8:10 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
Sam McFadden -- 12/29/2003, 12:10 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
LeeG -- 12/29/2003, 12:34 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
Sam McFadden -- 12/29/2003, 3:12 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
LeeG -- 12/29/2003, 4:31 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
LeeG -- 12/29/2003, 4:36 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
LeeG -- 12/29/2003, 4:45 pm- Thanks *NM*
Sam McFadden -- 12/29/2003, 7:11 pm
- Thanks *NM*
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
LeeG -- 12/28/2003, 11:19 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
Chuck in Pa -- 12/28/2003, 10:17 pm- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
LeeG -- 12/28/2003, 11:08 pm
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6 *LINK*
Richard Kohlström -- 12/28/2003, 7:39 pm - Re: Material: 2x4 > 6
- Re: Material: 2x4 > 6