Boat Building Forum

Find advice on all aspects of building your own kayak, canoe or any lightweight boats

Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
By:Mike Scarborough
Date: 3/24/2008, 8:35 am
In Response To: Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? (HenkA)

: Keep in mind that the 2D panel shape does not uniquely determine the 3D
: shape. The tension causes a range of possible shapes.

This was never more apparent to me than when I built a SnG kayak in a class at The Wooden Boat School. Even though every kayak was the same design, they all came out slightly different. In effect, there are an infinent number of hull shapes possible from a set of panel shapes, but only one correct hull shape. I do however, like to spend a lot of time looking at the hull before I fillet. The human eyes is very adept at spotting inperfections. And the human mind can tell a beautiful shape from and ugly one in a flash. I measure and measure again, but in the end I always trust my eyes. Experience helps here too. After seeing enough kayaks, you get a feel for what looks right and what looks clunky.

In response to Bill about his comment that an overly deep "V" at the keel can cause low stability--I've had that experience with a Patuxtent 17. It has less than an extra 1/2 inch of depth at the keel, but it's so tippy that most people who try it won't paddle it.

Mike

Messages In This Thread

S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/21/2008, 9:01 pm
Got an answer! I goofed!
Kudzu -- 3/27/2008, 9:32 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
HenkA -- 3/28/2008, 3:38 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Kudzu -- 3/29/2008, 10:14 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
HenkA -- 3/30/2008, 7:23 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Bryan Hansel -- 3/31/2008, 11:11 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
HenkA -- 4/1/2008, 1:37 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Bryan Hansel -- 4/1/2008, 11:18 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Toni V -- 3/31/2008, 1:48 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Kudzu -- 3/30/2008, 9:21 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Bill Hamm -- 3/27/2008, 4:19 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *Pic*
Kudzu -- 3/22/2008, 10:17 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Etienne Muller -- 3/23/2008, 7:23 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/23/2008, 8:18 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/24/2008, 10:26 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/25/2008, 9:14 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Bill Hamm -- 3/26/2008, 12:53 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Etienne Muller -- 3/24/2008, 10:51 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Bill Hamm -- 3/24/2008, 1:00 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/23/2008, 10:09 pm
Mixed results, not definitive answer
Kudzu -- 3/24/2008, 5:17 pm
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Toni V -- 3/25/2008, 5:24 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Bill Hamm -- 3/26/2008, 12:48 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
HenkA -- 3/28/2008, 3:45 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Bill Hamm -- 3/28/2008, 10:57 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
HenkA -- 3/28/2008, 10:23 pm
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Bill Hamm -- 3/29/2008, 12:55 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Robert McMurray -- 3/24/2008, 7:16 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/24/2008, 8:44 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Paul Sylvester -- 3/23/2008, 6:38 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/23/2008, 1:23 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Duane Strosaker -- 3/22/2008, 10:49 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Mike Scarborough -- 3/22/2008, 9:00 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *Pic*
Kudzu -- 3/22/2008, 9:54 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *Pic*
Duane Strosaker -- 3/22/2008, 12:30 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *LINK*
Kudzu -- 3/22/2008, 1:40 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/22/2008, 11:38 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Mike Scarborough -- 3/24/2008, 8:35 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Mike Scarborough -- 3/22/2008, 10:13 am