Re: GC, was: HPLC?
In Response To: Re: GC, was: HPLC? (Etienne Muller)
: I can't believe i read this thread
It was a diversion, Et.
And I can't believe I spent two friggin weeks trying to get improved peak separation, going through two rejoycing periods during which I shouted out, "Aha!", thinking I finally had it only to realize that carry over was wrecking my day. My partner was thinking I was a genius while I was thinking I was an idiot. Ah well, such is life. Time to look at a new phase.
Robert N Pruden
Messages In This Thread
- Off Topic: Retention times, flow rates, resolved peaks...
Robert N Pruden -- 8/25/2009, 1:29 pm- Scientific Breakthrough Eases Rob's High BP
Robert N Pruden -- 8/31/2009, 11:37 pm- HPLC?
Pawistik -- 8/25/2009, 6:28 pm- Re: HPLC?
Robert N Pruden -- 8/25/2009, 7:59 pm- GC, was: HPLC?
Toni V -- 8/26/2009, 3:59 am- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
Etienne Muller -- 8/26/2009, 5:14 am- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
Robert N Pruden -- 8/26/2009, 12:30 pm- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
Sean -- 8/26/2009, 10:07 pm- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
Pawistik -- 9/1/2009, 1:37 pm- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
Robert N Pruden -- 8/27/2009, 12:27 am- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
Pawistik -- 9/1/2009, 1:52 pm- Re: GC, was: HPLC?------WebKitFormBoundaryYv72mXAF
Robert N Pruden------WebKitFormBoundaryYv72mXAF1+L -- 9/1/2009, 3:13 pm
- Re: GC, was: HPLC?------WebKitFormBoundaryYv72mXAF
- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
- Re: GC, was: HPLC?
- Re: HPLC?
Glen Smith -- 8/25/2009, 8:24 pm - Re: GC, was: HPLC?
- GC, was: HPLC?
- HPLC?
- Scientific Breakthrough Eases Rob's High BP