Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
In Response To: Re: S&G: Lightweight layup (wwfloyd)
: Seadogs are VERY heavy... unless there's some version other than
: the ones I got from Newfound. I have been conflicted about using
: them on my latest and lightest SOF. I do like them, and
: rationalize that I've saved enough weight elsewhere, that I can
: afford the luxury.
: I wonder if you are thinking along similar lines. I was kind of
: surprised to see the Seadogs listed with your lightweight specs.
Sea Dogs are I think plastic and pretty light. Yakima's (werners) are metal and very heavy, also darned near indestrutable.
Bill H.
Messages In This Thread
- S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert -- 12/5/2009, 8:05 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
LeeG -- 12/7/2009, 8:37 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert -- 12/7/2009, 11:03 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
LeeG -- 12/17/2009, 11:22 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
LeeG -- 12/10/2009, 3:57 pm - Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert -- 12/7/2009, 10:12 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Chuck -- 12/7/2009, 1:36 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Mike Savage -- 12/7/2009, 1:34 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/8/2009, 1:33 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/8/2009, 1:31 am - Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Jim Farrelly------WebKitFormBoundary+jH3iW3RBvAm9G -- 12/6/2009, 8:18 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Alex Ferguson -- 12/6/2009, 5:32 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert N Pruden -- 12/7/2009, 11:28 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Alex Ferguson -- 12/8/2009, 5:12 am
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Andrew Sommer -- 12/5/2009, 3:50 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup *PIC*
Kurt Maurer -- 12/5/2009, 6:45 pm
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Malcolm Schweizer -- 12/5/2009, 12:51 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert N Pruden -- 12/7/2009, 11:36 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/8/2009, 11:09 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/9/2009, 2:42 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/9/2009, 9:22 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 1:49 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/10/2009, 5:17 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 9:39 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/10/2009, 10:15 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 5:41 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 12/11/2009, 7:50 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/11/2009, 11:40 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 12/12/2009, 8:54 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/12/2009, 10:22 am
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 9:24 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
george jung -- 12/10/2009, 2:25 pm
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/8/2009, 1:28 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert N Pruden -- 12/8/2009, 7:23 pm
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Dave Gentry -- 12/5/2009, 12:39 pm - Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup