Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
By:wwfloyd
Date: 12/10/2009, 10:15 am
Date: 12/10/2009, 10:15 am
In Response To: Re: S&G: Lightweight layup (Bill Hamm)
Hmm, as a result of this conversation, I had got to looking, too. But, only come up with this reference, which says Yakima's are 2 lb. 3 oz... though not an authoritative source.
http://www.examiner.com/x-23194-Detroit-Kayaking-Examiner~y2009m11d3-Kayaking-Foot-Pegs-and-Foot-Braces
: Ok, took awile, looked it up the Yakima's are about 1 lb. heavier,
: 4 lbs. vs. 3 lbs.
: Both are grossly heavy to add to a boat, if I do it again I'll make
: my own.
: Bill H.
Messages In This Thread
- S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert -- 12/5/2009, 8:05 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
LeeG -- 12/7/2009, 8:37 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert -- 12/7/2009, 11:03 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
LeeG -- 12/17/2009, 11:22 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
LeeG -- 12/10/2009, 3:57 pm - Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert -- 12/7/2009, 10:12 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Chuck -- 12/7/2009, 1:36 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Mike Savage -- 12/7/2009, 1:34 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/8/2009, 1:33 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/8/2009, 1:31 am - Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Jim Farrelly------WebKitFormBoundary+jH3iW3RBvAm9G -- 12/6/2009, 8:18 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Alex Ferguson -- 12/6/2009, 5:32 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert N Pruden -- 12/7/2009, 11:28 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Alex Ferguson -- 12/8/2009, 5:12 am
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Andrew Sommer -- 12/5/2009, 3:50 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup *PIC*
Kurt Maurer -- 12/5/2009, 6:45 pm
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Malcolm Schweizer -- 12/5/2009, 12:51 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert N Pruden -- 12/7/2009, 11:36 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/8/2009, 11:09 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/9/2009, 2:42 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/9/2009, 9:22 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 1:49 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/10/2009, 5:17 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 9:39 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
wwfloyd -- 12/10/2009, 10:15 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 5:41 pm- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 12/11/2009, 7:50 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/11/2009, 11:40 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Dan Caouette (CSFW) -- 12/12/2009, 8:54 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/12/2009, 10:22 am
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/10/2009, 9:24 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
george jung -- 12/10/2009, 2:25 pm
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Bill Hamm -- 12/8/2009, 1:28 am- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Robert N Pruden -- 12/8/2009, 7:23 pm
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
Dave Gentry -- 12/5/2009, 12:39 pm - Re: S&G: Lightweight layup
- Re: S&G: Lightweight layup