Boat Building Forum

Find advice on all aspects of building your own kayak, canoe or any lightweight boats

Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
By:Justin
Date: 5/20/2010, 1:59 pm
In Response To: Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g (Michael)

: Justin,

: I built a kayak very similar to that one many years ago. I used it
: in a subsistance lifestyle in bush Alaska for years. I shot and
: transported deer, I packed fresh water to the cabin, and I used
: it for exploration among the myriad islands.

: The boat was very stable, moved very well, carried weight
: fantastically well, and was very durable with canvas sailcloth.
: It never came close to rolling, something that many on this
: forum will consider a bad thing. You could stand up in it, you
: could sit on the side deck if you kept your cg inboard.

: The only fault I can cite is that it is heavier than more modern
: boats. You can see that it uses more frames and more stringers,
: and heavy canvas with heavy lagging adds weight. Having weight
: in a boat is only a detriment if it's so low volume that it cuts
: into the boat's capacity, or if you want to be able to carry it
: long distances. Otherwise having some boat weight is beneficial;
: native kayak users ballasted their boats with rocks to make them
: seaworthy and seakindly.

: If you like the looks of the boat you asked about then build it.
: You will not be disappointed with it.

: Best,

: Michael

Thanks for the info! To be honest I am still a bit leary about that particular design, and I don't plan on carrying much in the way of cargo. I really want a boat that is fairly stable, and reasonably easy to paddle and steer. After looking at a lot of designs and info given by the great people on this forum I am leaning toward Yost's Sea Bee, although it may be a while before I can save up some cash for materials.

Thanks,
Justin

Messages In This Thread

Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any good?
Justin -- 5/18/2010, 1:03 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Michael -- 5/20/2010, 12:14 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/20/2010, 1:59 pm
PPS: *PIC*
Michael -- 5/20/2010, 12:51 pm
Re: PPS:
Michael -- 5/20/2010, 12:53 pm
PS:
Michael -- 5/20/2010, 12:30 pm
My two cents *PIC*
Dave Gentry -- 5/19/2010, 9:54 am
Re: My two cents
graybeard -- 5/19/2010, 1:56 pm
Re: My two cents
Mike Bielski -- 5/19/2010, 4:19 pm
Re: My two cents
graybeard -- 5/20/2010, 2:23 pm
Addendum
Dave Gentry -- 5/19/2010, 10:08 am
Re: Addendum
Kudzu -- 5/19/2010, 3:16 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Malcolm Schweizer -- 5/19/2010, 2:02 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Kudzu -- 5/18/2010, 9:41 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Malcolm Schweizer -- 5/20/2010, 8:55 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Charlie -- 5/18/2010, 9:04 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
wwfloyd -- 5/18/2010, 4:12 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/18/2010, 7:10 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Brian Scarborough -- 5/19/2010, 9:35 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Mike Hanks -- 5/21/2010, 11:52 am
Re: PU?
Doug S -- 5/21/2010, 2:11 pm
Re: PU?
Mike Hanks -- 5/21/2010, 3:29 pm
Re: PU?
Doug S -- 5/21/2010, 10:56 pm
Re: PU?
Mike Hanks -- 5/22/2010, 1:13 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/20/2010, 12:27 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/20/2010, 10:15 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Mike Savage -- 5/20/2010, 5:46 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/20/2010, 8:05 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Mike Savage -- 5/21/2010, 5:27 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/21/2010, 6:01 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/21/2010, 12:47 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Brian Scarborough -- 5/20/2010, 7:34 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/21/2010, 12:42 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
brian scarborough -- 5/21/2010, 7:08 am
Warning - Thread drift
Dave Gentry -- 5/20/2010, 12:11 am
Re: Warning - Thread drift
Bill Hamm -- 5/20/2010, 12:30 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/19/2010, 12:25 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
wwfloyd -- 5/18/2010, 11:29 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/19/2010, 1:38 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
graybeard -- 5/19/2010, 2:02 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
wwfloyd -- 5/18/2010, 8:39 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/19/2010, 12:55 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Dave Gentry -- 5/19/2010, 1:48 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Dave Gentry -- 5/19/2010, 9:27 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/20/2010, 12:22 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/20/2010, 1:43 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Brian Scarborough -- 5/20/2010, 7:38 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Bill Hamm -- 5/21/2010, 12:36 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/20/2010, 10:12 am
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Brian Scarborough -- 5/20/2010, 12:15 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Justin -- 5/20/2010, 2:06 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
brian scarborough -- 5/20/2010, 9:46 pm
Re: Skin-on-Frame: Are thewoodshop.com plans any g
Kurt Maurer -- 5/18/2010, 7:43 pm