Thanks, Nick!
I wouldn't be the builder/paddler that I am today without your efforts to maintain this site: that's a good thing. Because of the great folks who frequent this site, I have become a good and well experienced paddler with enough knowledge to go where I want to when I want to and still maintain enough sense to avoid those areas where danger lurks. Hence, I opted out of the Hudson Bay paddle last year due to the heightened risk of polar bear attack this year. All I had to do to make that decision was remember commentary from this site and realize that the risk outweighed my desire to keep paddling for years to come. Yes, I have managed to get myself into occasional trouble and yes, because I paddle I lose cameras fairly regularly and yes, I occasionally wreck my boats but hey, while the kayaks are in one piece, many folks always notice and want to stop and talk...especially when they see the Night Heron S&G I am currently using. This winter I will be doing some interesting decorative work on the Night Heron. I have this really large bottle of gold glitters and some spare epoxy...when I am done that kayak is going to really be noticeable during bright sunny days. Thanks again, Nick
Robert N Pruden
Messages In This Thread
- ADMIN! Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines *LINK*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/2/2010, 8:59 am- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Robert N Pruden -- 12/10/2010, 9:49 am- Shouldn't the title read: bi[semi] annual review..
Robert W -- 12/3/2010, 7:13 am- Re: Shouldn't the title read: bi[semi] annual revi
Kirk Fredericks - Farback Carpentry and Automation -- 12/3/2010, 8:12 am- Re: Shouldn't the title read: bi[semi] annual revi
Bill Hamm -- 12/3/2010, 7:34 am - Re: Shouldn't the title read: bi[semi] annual revi
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Richard Hayes -- 12/2/2010, 5:17 pm- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Don T -- 12/2/2010, 9:36 pm
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines *PIC*
mtkayak (Mike Trutwin) -- 12/2/2010, 1:28 pm- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
bromasi -- 12/2/2010, 3:47 pm
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Kirk Fredericks - Farback Carpentry and Automation -- 12/2/2010, 1:17 pm- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Bill Hamm -- 12/2/2010, 9:30 am- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
David Smith -- 12/2/2010, 3:37 pm- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
J Law -- 12/4/2010, 7:59 am- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
David Smith -- 12/4/2010, 8:15 am
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Bill Hamm -- 12/2/2010, 4:51 pm- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
David Smith -- 12/3/2010, 11:02 am- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Bill Hamm -- 12/3/2010, 11:13 am- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
David Smith -- 12/3/2010, 12:05 pm- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Noel Bennett -- 12/3/2010, 4:58 pm
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
Bill Hamm -- 12/3/2010, 11:12 am - Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines
- Shouldn't the title read: bi[semi] annual review..
- Re: Other: pseudo-annual review of the Guidelines